In Nukhet Sandal (ed.), Oxford Research Encyclopedia of International Studies. New York, NY, USA: Oxford University Press. pp. 1-30 (2021)

Authors
Shinkyu Lee
Oberlin College
Abstract
International relations (IR) scholars have increasingly integrated Hannah Arendt into their works. Her fierce critique of the conventional ideas of politics driven by rulership, enforcement, and violence has a particular resonance for theorists seeking to critically revisit the basic assumptions of IR scholarship. Arendt’s thinking, however, contains complexity and nuance that need careful treatment when extended beyond domestic politics. In particular, Arendt’s vision of free politics—characterized by the dualistic emphasis on agonistic action and institutional stability—raises two crucial issues that need further elaboration for IR research that appropriates her thinking. One involves the orientation of her international thoughts. Although Arendt shows “idealistic” aspirations for authentic politics practiced by diverse equals in an institutionally articulated space of freedom, she never loses interest in the extant situation of “non-idealistic” politics. Engaging with Arendt’s theory orientation requires a careful analysis of difficult topics, such as her distinctive conception of the political and her critiques of the nation-state and international law. The other topic that needs clarification when Arendt’s thoughts are applied to IR involves specific ways of associating different sites of power. A close examination of Arendt’s council-based federalism reveals her distinctive idea of international politics, based on her acute awareness of the fundamental complexity that lies in power association and state agency. Bringing IR topics like state agency into conversation with her works generates illuminating questions for Arendt scholarship. Likewise, the ongoing debate on agonistic and institutional features of Arendt’s thoughts can provide crucial insights into critical studies of international politics.
Keywords Arendt  freedom  agency  idealism  realism  human rights  nation-state  international society  federalism  agonism
Categories (categorize this paper)
Buy the book Find it on Amazon.com
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Ideal Vs. Non‐Ideal Theory: A Conceptual Map.Laura Valentini - 2012 - Philosophy Compass 7 (9):654-664.
The Concept of the Political.Carl Schmitt - 1996 - University of Chicago Press.
Lectures on Kant’s Political Philosophy.Hannah Arendt - 1982 - University of Chicago Press.

View all 80 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Real Promise of Federalism: A Case Study of Arendt’s International Thought.Shinkyu Lee - 2022 - European Journal of Political Theory 21 (3):539-560.
Hannah Arendt: Key Concepts.Patrick Hayden - 2014 - Acumen Publishing.
Freedom and Law.Alfonso Ballesteros - 2020 - Archiv für Rechts- Und Sozialphilosophie 106 (1):19-28.
Freedom and Law: Hannah Arendt's Unsolved Puzzle?Alfonso Ballesteros - 2020 - Archiv Fuer Rechts Und Sozialphilosphie 106 (1):19-28.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2021-11-30

Total views
142 ( #83,420 of 2,518,508 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
61 ( #13,060 of 2,518,508 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes