Is R.S. Peters' way of mentioning women in his texts detrimental to philosophy of education? Some considerations and questions

Ethics and Education 7 (3):291-302 (2012)

Authors
Helen Lees
Newman University
Abstract
. Is R.S. Peters' way of mentioning women in his texts detrimental to philosophy of education? Some considerations and questions. Ethics and Education: Vol. 7, Creating spaces, pp. 291-302. doi: 10.1080/17449642.2013.767002
Keywords education  concept  feminism  R. S. Peters  educational philosophy  philosophy of education
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1080/17449642.2013.767002
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 49,040
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.Thomas S. Kuhn - 1962 - University of Chicago Press.
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.Thomas S. Kuhn - 1962 - University of Chicago Press.
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.David Bohm - 1964 - Philosophical Quarterly 14 (57):377-379.
Ethics and Education.R. S. Peters - 1966 - London: Allen & Unwin.

View all 32 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-03-15

Total views
66 ( #137,366 of 2,311,025 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
9 ( #86,766 of 2,311,025 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature