Leibniz on divine concurrence

Philosophical Review 113 (2):203-248 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Leibniz was a divine concurrentist. That is to say, when it came to the question of how God’s causal power relates to the natural causal activity of creatures, Leibniz held that both God and the creature are directly involved in the occurrence of these effects.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 76,419

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Leibniz on Knowledge and God.Christia Mercer - 2002 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 76 (4):531-550.
Leibniz on Divine Concurrence.John Whipple - 2010 - Philosophy Compass 5 (10):865-879.
Leibniz and the Possibility of God's Existence.David Werther - 1996 - Religious Studies 32 (1):37 - 48.
Malebranche and Leibniz on the best of all possible worlds.Tad M. Schmaltz - 2010 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 48 (1):28-48.
Leibniz on divine concurrence with secondary causes.Ezio Vailati - 2002 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 10 (2):209 – 230.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
328 (#36,137)

6 months
2 (#300,644)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

The Logic of Leibniz’s Borrowed Reality Argument.Stephen Puryear - 2020 - Philosophical Quarterly 70 (279):350-370.
The Heyday of Teleology and Early Modern Philosophy.Jeffrey K. McDonough - 2011 - Midwest Studies in Philosophy 35 (1):179-204.
Monadic Interaction.Stephen Puryear - 2010 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 18 (5):763-796.
Locke’s Metaphysics and Newtonian Metaphysics.Lisa Downing - 2014 - In Zvi Biener & Eric Schliesser (eds.), Newton and Empiricism. Oxford University Press. pp. 97-118.

View all 11 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references