Malament and Zabell on Gibbs phase averaging

Philosophy of Science 56 (2):325-340 (1989)
Abstract
In their paper "Why Gibbs Phase Averages Work--The Role of Ergodic Theory" (1980), David Malament and Sandy Zabell attempt to explain why phase averaging over the microcanonical ensemble gives correct predictions for the values of thermodynamic observables, for an ergodic system at equilibrium. Their idea is to bypass the traditional use of limit theorems, by relying on a uniqueness result about the microcanonical measure--namely, that it is uniquely stationary translation-continuous. I argue that their explanation begs questions about the relationship between thermodynamic equilibrium and statistical equilibrium; I argue in addition that any account which supports their view of the relationship between these two notions of equilibrium will likely use the limit theorems in traditional ways, and thereby bypass the explanation they offer
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1086/289491
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 30,781
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Taking Thermodynamics Too Seriously.Craig Callender - 2001 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 32 (4):539-553.
An Empirical Approach to Symmetry and Probability.Jill North - 2010 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 41 (1):27-40.
Justifying Typicality Measures of Boltzmannian Statistical Mechanics and Dynamical Systems.Charlotte Werndl - 2013 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 44 (4):470-479.
Taking Thermodynamics Too Seriously.Craig Callender - 2001 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 32 (4):539-553.
Ergodic Theory, Interpretations of Probability and the Foundations of Statistical Mechanics.Janneke van Lith - 2001 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 32 (4):581--94.

View all 8 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles
The Explanatory Power of Phase Spaces.Aidan Lyon & Mark Colyvan - 2007 - Philosophia Mathematica 16 (2):227-243.
The Foundational Role of Ergodic Theory.Massimiliano Badino - 2006 - Foundations of Science 11 (4):323-347.
Boltzmann, Gibbs, and the Concept of Equilibrium.David Lavis - 2008 - Philosophy of Science 75 (5):682-696.
Ergodic Theory, Interpretations of Probability and the Foundations of Statistical Mechanics.Janneke van Lith - 2001 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 32 (4):581-594.
Ergodic Theory, Interpretations of Probability and the Foundations of Statistical Mechanics.Janneke van Lith - 2001 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 32 (4):581--94.
Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total downloads
42 ( #127,945 of 2,199,652 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #300,206 of 2,199,652 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature