Law and Philosophy 41 (2):375-396 (2022)

Abstract
The wrongfulness constraint, as a principle of criminalization, is supposed to preclude criminalization in the absence of wrongfulness. Crimes that look especially problematic from the perspective of the wrongfulness constraint are mala prohibita offenses. The aim of this Essay is to consider the question whether the wrongfulness constraint can serve as an effective tool to curb overcriminalization by looking at the case of mala prohibita offenses. This Essay defends the following propositions. First, because of the availability of an array of tools to defend various mala prohibita offenses as satisfying the wrongfulness constraint, it is often not a straightforward matter to demonstrate that committing a malum prohibitum offense is not wrongful. Second, as a result, the wrongfulness constraint is of limited use as a way of stemming the tide of overcriminalization. The Essay concludes by suggesting, more broadly, that the problem of overcriminalization is not that too many crimes violate the wrongfulness constraint but that criminal laws, even those that satisfy the wrongfulness constraint, can easily become a source of oppression, and that asking whether crimes violate the wrongfulness constraint may be counterproductive because the question misdirects our attention.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1007/s10982-022-09443-z
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Translate to english
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 70,307
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Wrongfulness Constraint in Criminalisation.Antje du Bois-Pedain - 2014 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 8 (1):149-169.
The Wrongfulness Constraint in Criminalisation.Antje Bois-Pedain - 2014 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 8 (1):149-169.
Criminalization, Legitimacy, and Welfare.Dan Priel - 2018 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 12 (4):657-676.
Mala Prohibita and Proportionality.Youngjae Lee - 2021 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 15 (3):425-446.
Wrongfulness and Prohibitions.J. R. Edwards & A. P. Simester - 2014 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 8 (1):171-186.
What is the Harm Principle For?John Stanton-Ife - 2016 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 10 (2):329-353.
Terrorism.Suzanne Uniacke - 2016 - In Helen Frowe & Seth Lazar (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Ethics of War. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
The Constraint Satisfaction Problem and Universal Algebra.Libor Barto - 2015 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 21 (3):319-337.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2022-03-06

Total views
1 ( #1,546,653 of 2,507,870 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,715 of 2,507,870 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.

My notes