Authors
Marvin Lee
La Salle University
Abstract
The 2017 story of Charlie Gard is revisited. Upon the British High Court’s ruling in favor of the physicians that the infant should be allowed to die without the experimental treatment, the view of the public as well as the opinions of bioethicists and Catholic bishops are divided, interestingly along with a cultural line. American bioethicists and Catholic bishops tend to believe that the parents should have the final say while British/European bioethicists and Catholic bishops in general side with the court’s decision. The paper explores the place of culture in bioethical reasoning between the UK/Europe and the US while claiming that cultural differences are more important than geopolitical or religious differences to understand the bioethical positions of a group. In addition, the authors introduce a decision-making program for handicapped neonates which is developed by the American Jesuit Bioethicist, Richard McCormick, and modified further by the contemporary American Jesuit Bioethicist, Peter A. Clark, in an attempt to see if the program’s normatizing categories can contribute to the culture-laden ethical discussions on Charlie’s case. However, it is admitted that the McCormick-Clark device is borne out of the American and Catholic theological context.
Keywords Charlie Gard, comparative culture, Richard McCormick, medical futility
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Physician's Authority to Withhold Futile Treatment.Glenn G. Griener - 1995 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 20 (2):207-224.
Medicine,Health Care and Philosophy.[author unknown] - 2004 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 7 (3):367-371.
On Richard McCormick.Lisa Sowle Cahill - 1993 - In Allen Verhey & Stephen E. Lammers (eds.), Theological Voices in Medical Ethics. W.B. Eerdmans Pub. Co..

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Introduction to the Special Issue.Martha Montello - 2018 - Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 60 (3):293-294.
The Charlie Gard Case.Stephen M. Krason - 2018 - Catholic Social Science Review 23:367-370.
Charlie Gard: In Defence of the Law.Eliana Close, Lindy Willmott & Benjamin P. White - 2018 - Journal of Medical Ethics 44 (7):476-480.
Charlie Chaplin’s Films and American Culture Patterns.Harry A. Grace - 1952 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 10 (4):353-363.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2019-01-05

Total views
239 ( #35,684 of 2,401,777 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
58 ( #12,739 of 2,401,777 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes