Social Science Information 59 (4):563-568 (2020)
Abstract |
The claim that rationality is ‘limited, falsified and unhelpful’ for explaining norms is false, for it does not apply to rationality as conceptualized by rational choice theory. Rationality as conceptualized by rational choice theory is not limited: it can be used to develop explanations of any observed human behavior. Rationality as conceptualized by rational choice theory has not been falsified: indeed, it is not falsifiable. Rationality as conceptualized by rational choice theory is not unhelpful for explaining norms: it is often used to develop explanations of observed norms, including norms that seem most puzzling. Rationality as conceptualized by rational choice theory provides a universal framework for developing explanations of human behavior.
|
Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
Categories |
No categories specified (categorize this paper) |
DOI | 10.1177/0539018420963351 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
Varieties of ‘Rationality’ and the Question of Their Continued Theoretical Relevance.Tibor Rutar - 2020 - Social Science Information 59 (4):542-562.
Citations of this work BETA
Defending the Role of Rationality in the Social Sciences, Rationally.Tibor Rutar - 2020 - Social Science Information 59 (4):575-579.
Rationality, Strategic Interactions, and Theories of Middle Range.Tobias Wolbring - 2020 - Social Science Information 59 (4):569-574.
Similar books and articles
Rational Decision Making as Performative Praxis: Explaining Rationality’s Éternel Retour.Laure Cabantous & Jean-Pascal Gond - 2011 - Organization Science 22 (3):573-586.
Norms and Rationality. Is Moral Behavior a Form of Rational Action?Karl-Dieter Opp - 2013 - Theory and Decision 74 (3):383-409.
The Concept of Rationality in Modern Social Sciences: A Critical Appraisal of Joseph A. Schumpeter’s Essay on “The Meaning of Rationality”.Andreas Diekmann - 2018 - In Helmut Staubmann & Victor Lidz (eds.), Rationality in the Social Sciences: The Schumpeter-Parsons Seminar 1939-40 and Current Perspectives. Springer Verlag. pp. 121-135.
How Evolutionary Biology Challenges the Classical Theory of Rational Choice.W. S. Cooper - 1989 - Biology and Philosophy 4 (4):457-481.
Introduction: Aspects of Rationality.Alfred R. Mele & Piers Rawling - 2004 - In Alfred R. Mele & Piers Rawling (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Rationality. Oxford University Press.
Enhancing Rationality: Heuristics, Biases, and The Critical Thinking Project.Mark Battersby - 2016 - Informal Logic 36 (2):99-120.
Scientific Rationality by Degrees.Alexandru Marcoci & James Nguyen - 2017 - In Michela Massimi, Jan-Willem Romeijn & Gerhard Schurz (eds.), EPSA15 Selected Papers: The 5th conference of the European Philosophy of Science Association in Düsseldorf. Springer International Publishing. pp. 321-333.
On Being ‘Rational’ About Norms.Rem B. Edwards - 1967 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 5 (3):180-186.
Rationalität und Normativität.Christine Tiefensee & Johannes Marx - 2015 - Zeitschrift Für Politische Theorie 6:19-37.
Advice for the Steady: Decision Theory and the Requirements of Instrumental Rationality.Johanna Thoma - 2017 - Dissertation,
A Critique of Habermas' Theory of Practical Rationality.Nader Saiedi - 1987 - Studies in Soviet Thought 33 (3):251-265.
A Critique of Habermas' Theory of Practical Rationality.Nader Saiedi - 1987 - Studies in East European Thought 33 (3):251-265.
Rational Choice and Rule-Following Behavior.Bernd Lahno - 2007 - Rationality and Society 19 (4):425-450.
Scientific Rationality, Decisions and Choice.Vihren Bouzov - 2003 - In Dimitri Ginev (ed.), Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol.236. Springer. pp. 17-31.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2020-11-05
Total views
1 ( #1,551,851 of 2,517,928 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #409,045 of 2,517,928 )
2020-11-05
Total views
1 ( #1,551,851 of 2,517,928 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #409,045 of 2,517,928 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.