Problems of religious pluralism: A zen critique of John Hick's ontological monomorphism

Philosophy East and West 48 (3):453-477 (1998)
  Copy   BIBTEX


John Hick's "pluralistic hypothesis" of religion essays a comprehensive vision of religious diversity and its attendant soteriological, epistemological, and ontological implications. At the heart of Hick's proposal is the belief in the transcendental unity and soteriological identity of all religions. While coherent and compelling, Hick's model militates against those traditions that do not possess an ultimate noumenal referent that undergirds the phenomenal responses of culturally conditioned traditions. One of those traditions, namely Sōtō Zen Buddhism, at once defies Hick's categories and presses for an alternative understanding of the epistemological, metaphysical, and soteriological issues



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,100

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A Response to John Hick.George I. Mavrodes - 1997 - Faith and Philosophy 14 (3):289-294.
Religious pluralism.William L. Rowe - 1999 - Religious Studies 35 (2):139-150.
Perils of Pluralism.Kelly James Clark - 1997 - Faith and Philosophy 14 (3):303-320.
The philosophical challenge of religious diversity.Philip L. Quinn & Kevin Meeker (eds.) - 2000 - New York: Oxford University Press.


Added to PP

287 (#71,159)

6 months
15 (#168,953)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jung Lee
Northeastern University

Citations of this work

Can Neurotheology Explain Religion?Dave Vliegenthart - 2011 - Archive for the Psychology of Religion 33 (2):137-171.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references