Hypatia 26 (2):352-73 (2011)

Authors
Carole J. Lee
University of Washington
Abstract
An empirically sensitive formulation of the norms of transformative criticism must recognize that even public and shared standards of evaluation can be implemented in ways that unintentionally perpetuate and reproduce forms of social bias that are epistemically detrimental. Helen Longino’s theory can explain and redress such social bias by treating peer evaluations as hypotheses based on data and by requiring a kind of perspectival diversity that bears, not on the content of the community’s knowledge claims, but on the beliefs and norms of the culture of the knowledge community itself. To illustrate how socializing cognition can bias evaluations, we focus on peer-review practices, with some discussion of peer-review practices in philosophy. Data include responses to surveys by editors from general philosophy journals, as well as analyses of reviews and editorial decisions for the 2007 Cognitive Science Society Conference.
Keywords procedural objectivity  objectivity  implicit bias
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1527-2001.2011.01178.x
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 70,008
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Fate of Knowledge.Helen E. Longino - 2001 - Princeton University Press.

View all 30 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Bias in Peer Review.Carole J. Lee, Cassidy R. Sugimoto, Guo Zhang & Blaise Cronin - 2013 - Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 64 (1):2-17.
Ranking Exercises in Philosophy and Implicit Bias.Jennifer Saul - 2012 - Journal of Social Philosophy 43 (3):256-273.
Objectivity in Science: New Perspectives From Science and Technology Studies.Flavia Padovani, Alan Richardson & Jonathan Y. Tsou (eds.) - 2015 - Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science, vol. 310. Springer.
Commensuration Bias in Peer Review.Carole J. Lee - 2015 - Philosophy of Science 82 (5):1272-1283,.

View all 21 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Bias in Peer Review.Carole J. Lee, Cassidy R. Sugimoto, Guo Zhang & Blaise Cronin - 2013 - Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 64 (1):2-17.
Can Scientists Be Objective?Malcolm Williams - 2006 - Social Epistemology 20 (2):163 – 180.
Objectivity.Lorraine Daston - 2007 - The MIT Press.
Objectivity in the News: Finding a Way Forward.Carrie Figdor - 2010 - Journal of Mass Media Ethics 25 (1):19 – 33.
IV. Longino and Heidegger on Objectivity.Philip Lewin - 1984 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 27 (1-4):145-148.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2012-07-24

Total views
92 ( #126,701 of 2,505,176 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
5 ( #139,900 of 2,505,176 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes