Social Biases and Solution for Procedural Objectivity

Hypatia 26 (2):352-73 (2011)
An empirically sensitive formulation of the norms of transformative criticism must recognize that even public and shared standards of evaluation can be implemented in ways that unintentionally perpetuate and reproduce forms of social bias that are epistemically detrimental. Helen Longino’s theory can explain and redress such social bias by treating peer evaluations as hypotheses based on data and by requiring a kind of perspectival diversity that bears, not on the content of the community’s knowledge claims, but on the beliefs and norms of the culture of the knowledge community itself. To illustrate how socializing cognition can bias evaluations, we focus on peer-review practices, with some discussion of peer-review practices in philosophy. Data include responses to surveys by editors from general philosophy journals, as well as analyses of reviews and editorial decisions for the 2007 Cognitive Science Society Conference.
Keywords procedural objectivity  objectivity  implicit bias
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1527-2001.2011.01178.x
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 24,411
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Miriam Solomon (2005). Groupthink Versus The Wisdom of Crowds. Southern Journal of Philosophy 44 (Supplement):28-42.

View all 14 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Carole J. Lee, Cassidy R. Sugimoto, Guo Zhang & Blaise Cronin (2013). Bias in Peer Review. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 64 (1):2-17.
Malcolm Williams (2006). Can Scientists Be Objective? Social Epistemology 20 (2):163 – 180.
Carrie Figdor (2010). Objectivity in the News: Finding a Way Forward. Journal of Mass Media Ethics 25 (1):19 – 33.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

51 ( #95,503 of 1,924,713 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

4 ( #211,819 of 1,924,713 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.