Should the No-Miracle Argument Add to Scientific Evidence?

Philosophia 42 (4):999-1004 (2014)

Authors
Wang-Yen Lee
National University of Singapore
Abstract
Lipton contends that the no-miracle argument is illegitimate, because it fails to adduce new evidence beyond that cited by scientists for their theories. The debate on this issue between Lipton and Psillos has focussed on whether there is a construal of the no-miracle argument in relation to first-order scientific inferences that can yield new evidence. I move away from this focus without taking sides, and argue that the no-miracle argument, on its two popular interpretations, is as legitimate, cogent, and useful an inductive argument for scientific realism as first-order scientific inferences to the best explanation even if it does not add to scientific evidence
Keywords The no-miracle argument  New evidence  Inference to the best explanation  Lipton  Psillos
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11406-014-9524-z
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 42,305
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Inference to the Best Explanation.Peter Lipton - 1993 - Routledge/Taylor and Francis Group.
Mathematics, Matter and Method. Philosophical Papers.Hilary Putnam - 1978 - Philosophy of Science 45 (1):151-155.
Philosophy of Science.Alexander Bird - 2000 - Mind 109 (434):325-327.

View all 8 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Levin and Ghins on the “No Miracle” Argument and Naturalism.Mario Alai - 2012 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 2 (1):85-110.
Why the Ultimate Argument for Scientific Realism Ultimately Fails.Moti Mizrahi - 2012 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 43 (1):132-138.
Abduction and Scientific Realism.Ilkka Niiniluoto - 2007 - The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 12:137-142.
Tracking Track Records, II.John Worrall - 2000 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 74 (1):207–235.
Tracking Track Records.John Worrall - 2000 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 74 (1):207-35.
Tracking Track Records, I.Peter Lipton - 2000 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 74 (1):179–205.
The Miraculous Choice Argument for Realism.E. C. Barnes - 2002 - Philosophical Studies 111 (2):97 - 120.
No New Miracles, Same Old Tricks.Jacob Busch - 2008 - Theoria 74 (2):102-114.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2014-03-10

Total views
32 ( #258,608 of 2,254,346 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #589,190 of 2,254,346 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature