Journal of International Political Theory:175508821989823 (forthcoming)

Authors
Abstract
How political communities should be constituted is at the center of Hannah Arendt’s engagement with two ancient sources of law: the Greek nomos and the Roman lex. Recent scholarship suggests that Arendt treats nomos as imperative and exclusive while lex has a relationship-establishing dimension and that for an inclusive form of polity, she favors lex over nomos. This article argues, however, that Arendt’s appreciation occurs within a general context of more reservations about Rome than Roman-centric interpretations admit. Her writings show that lex could not accommodate the agonistic spirit and Homeric impartiality that helped the Greeks achieve human greatness and surpassing excellence. Arendt also points out that Roman peace alliances occurred at the expense of disclosive competition among equals and assumed some form of domination. Indeed, although Arendt appreciates lex’s relationship-establishing aspect, she is undoubtedly critical of anti-political practices accompanying lex, manifested when the Romans required enemies’ submission to terms of peace the Romans themselves set. In the end, Arendt’s statements regarding nomos and lex highlight the fundamental challenge in free politics: balancing the internal demand of agonistic action with the external need to expand lasting ties.
Keywords Hannah Arendt  political association  agonistic action  freedom  democratic inclusion  empire
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1177/1755088219898237
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Lectures on Kant’s Political Philosophy.Hannah Arendt - 1982 - University of Chicago Press.
On Revolution.E. J. Hobsbawm & Hanna Arendt - 1965 - History and Theory 4 (2):252.
Between Past and Future.Judith N. Shklar & Hannah Arendt - 1963 - History and Theory 2 (3):286.

View all 31 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

The Real Promise of Federalism: A Case Study of Arendt’s International Thought.Shinkyu Lee - forthcoming - European Journal of Political Theory:147488512090605.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Give and Take: Arendt and the Nomos of Political Community.Hans Lindahl - 2006 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 32 (7):881-901.
Arendt’s Machiavellian Moment.Faisal Baluch - 2014 - European Journal of Political Theory 13 (2):154-177.
Violence and Power: A Critique of Hannah Arendt on the `Political'.Keith Breen - 2007 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 33 (3):343-372.
Kant y Hannah Arendt.Jacinto Rivera de Rosales - 2005 - Ideas Y Valores 54 (128):1-33.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2020-01-03

Total views
55 ( #187,305 of 2,433,036 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
11 ( #60,159 of 2,433,036 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes