Environmental Ethics 18 (3):297-309 (1996)

Abstract
In the literature of environmental philosophy, the single most potent argument that has been made against the claim that nature may possess intrinsic value in any objective sense is the Humean thesis of projectivism and its associated view that human consciousness is the source of all values. Theorists, in one way or another, have to face up to this challenge. For instance, J. Baird Callicott upholds this Humean foundation to modern Western philosophy. However, by distinguishing between the source and locus of value, he makes it possible to argue that nature is the locus of intrinsic value without at the same time compromising the thesis that human consciousness is the source of all values. On the other hand, Holmses Rolston, III, another eminent environmental philosopher, criticizes the distinction as well as challenges the Humean foundation itself. In this article, I attempt to resolve the disagreement between Callicott and Rolston over this particular distinction, thereby doing justice to the insights which each theorist, undoubtedly, has brought to bear on the issue of intrinsic value, at least as far as individual organisms is concerned. However, I am also critical of both for having failed to draw out the full implications behind certain crucial distinctions that should be made about the notion of intrinsic value itself
Keywords Applied Philosophy  General Interest
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 0163-4275
DOI 10.5840/enviroethics199618320
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 50,342
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Human Virtues and Natural Values.Simon P. James - 2006 - Environmental Ethics 28 (4):339-353.
Reconciling Utilitarian and Non-Utilitarian Approaches to Biodiversity Conservation.M. Loreau - 2014 - Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics 14 (1):27-32.

View all 9 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Rolston on Intrinsic Value: A Deconstruction.J. Baird Callicott - 1992 - Environmental Ethics 14 (2):129-143.
Hume’s Projectivist Legacy for Environmental Ethics.Paul Haught - 2006 - Environmental Ethics 28 (1):77-96.
Zen Buddhism and the Intrinsic Value of Nature.Simon P. James - 2003 - Contemporary Buddhism 4 (2):143-157.
Making and Finding Values in Nature: From a Humean Point of View.Y. S. Lo - 2006 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 49 (2):123 – 147.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
79 ( #116,076 of 2,326,062 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #284,939 of 2,326,062 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes