Philosophy 77 (3):331-347 (2002)

Authors
Brian Leftow
Rutgers University - New Brunswick
Abstract
Anselm is commonly credited with two a priori arguments for God's existence, the non-modal argument of Proslogion 2 and a modal argument some find in Proslogion 3. But his Reply to Gaunilo contains a third. The argument as Anselm gives it has flaws, but they are not fatal, and its main premise can serve as the basis of a simpler, stronger argument.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/S0031819102000335
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 64,185
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Millican on the Ontological Argument.Yujin Nagasawa - 2007 - Mind 116 (464):1027-1040.
God and Counterpossibles.Richard Brian Davis - 2006 - Religious Studies 42 (4):371.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
240 ( #41,810 of 2,455,051 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #225,792 of 2,455,051 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes