Modern Schoolman 72 (2-3):109 - 124 (1995)
Among the objections to the Christian doctrine of the Incarnation which Anselm takes up in ’Cur Deus Nomo’ is an argument that a wise God would not act so, because it is inefficient. I explicate Anselm’s reply to this. It is (I argue) that the Incarnation is an elegant way to achieve a large set of goods including human salvation, and that God might well be wise to treat a sort of beauty the Incarnation involves as a value more important than efficiency
|Keywords||Catholic Tradition History of Philosophy Philosophy and Religion|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Anselm on the Necessity of the Incarnation.Brian Leftow - 1995 - Religious Studies 31 (2):167 - 185.
Anselm on the Cost of Salvation.Brian Leftow - 1997 - Medieval Philosophy and Theology 6 (1):73 - 92.
Anselm on the Trinity.William E. Mann - 2004 - In The Cambridge Companion to Anselm. Cambridge University Press.
Justifying Atonement: An Anselmian Response to Modern Critics.Daniel Shannon - 2009 - Saint Anselm Journal 6 (2):1 - 19.
The Metaphysics of the Incarnation.Anna Marmodoro & Jonathan Hill (eds.) - 2011 - Oxford University Press USA.
Reasons, Emotions, and God's Presence in Anselm of Canterbury's Cur Deus Homo.Bernd Goebel & Vittorio Hösle - 2005 - Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 87 (2):189-210.
The Vatican's Dilemma: On the Morality of Ivf and the Incarnation.Howard M. Ducharme - 1991 - Bioethics 5 (1):57–66.
Added to index2012-06-16
Total downloads19 ( #253,316 of 2,151,964 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #398,812 of 2,151,964 )
How can I increase my downloads?
There are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.