Anselm on the Beauty of the Incarnation

Modern Schoolman 72 (2-3):109 - 124 (1995)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Among the objections to the Christian doctrine of the Incarnation which Anselm takes up in ’Cur Deus Nomo’ is an argument that a wise God would not act so, because it is inefficient. I explicate Anselm’s reply to this. It is (I argue) that the Incarnation is an elegant way to achieve a large set of goods including human salvation, and that God might well be wise to treat a sort of beauty the Incarnation involves as a value more important than efficiency

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,322

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Anselm on the Necessity of the Incarnation.Brian Leftow - 1995 - Religious Studies 31 (2):167 - 185.
The Metaphysics of the Incarnation.Anna Marmodoro & Jonathan Hill (eds.) - 2011 - Oxford University Press USA.
Anselm.Sandra Visser & Thomas Williams - 2009 - New York: Oxford University Press. Edited by Thomas Williams.
In Defense of Anselm.Mark Owen Webb - 2005 - Philo 8 (1):55-58.
Trinity, incarnation, and redemption.Saint Anselm - 1970 - New York,: Harper & Row.
Anselm's neglected argument.Brian Leftow - 2002 - Philosophy 77 (3):331-347.
Human Nature, Potency and the Incarnation.Alfred J. Freddoso - 1986 - Faith and Philosophy 3 (1):27-53.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-06-16

Downloads
70 (#228,790)

6 months
4 (#818,853)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Brian Leftow
Rutgers University - New Brunswick

Citations of this work

Christ, the Power and Possibility of God in St. Anselm of Canterbury.Jonathan McIntosh - 2019 - TheoLogica: An International Journal for Philosophy of Religion and Philosophical Theology 3 (1):3-21.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references