Arenas of Contestation: A Senian Social Justice Perspective on the Nature of Materiality in Impact Measurement

Journal of Business Ethics 179 (4):971-989 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Although the importance of measuring and reporting the social and environmental impact of organisational action is increasingly well recognised by both organisations and society at large, existing approaches to impact measurement are still far from being universally accepted. In this context, the stakeholder dynamics within the nascent field of impact investing demonstrate the complexity of resolving potentially differing perspectives on key impact measurement issues such as materiality. This paper argues, from an organisational perspective, that such arenas of contestation can be conceptualised in terms of social justice. Specifically, we draw upon Sen’s notions of ‘arrangement and realisation’ to explore the dynamics of contestation across a range of stakeholders concerning materiality judgements to suggest that such ‘arrangements’ may lead to suboptimal impact outcomes as ‘realisations.’ Our analysis of the nature of materiality contestations in impact measurement reveals the conflicts, tensions and paradoxes evident in this field of action. Empirically, we examine data drawn from 19 cases and 33 interviews. The analysis suggests three arenas of contestation around the materiality of impact measurement: the power dynamics between economically powerful investors and objectified investees; the conflicts between materiality norms and standards; and the interactions between all stakeholders with differing motivations towards radical or incremental materiality. Building upon this analysis, we then discuss how arenas of contested materiality may be mediated by drawing upon Sen’s notions of transcending the individual interests of the invested parties for the greater good via processes of contextualisation and case-specificity.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 76,479

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Theorizing Democratic Education from a Senian Perspective.Tony DeCesare - 2013 - Studies in Philosophy and Education 33 (2):149-170.
Plato and Rawls: Justice in Individual or Society?Mohammad Javad Movahedi Said Binaye Motlagh - 2015 - Journal of Philosophical Investigations at University of Tabriz 9 (16):197-213.
Pragmatic Social Justice: A Conceptual Framework for Practitioners.Eric Hogan - 2017 - Essays in the Philosophy of Humanism, Issue Vol 25 No. 1 25 (1):43-52.
Talk the Walk: Impact Measurement of Corporate Philanthropy.Karen Maas - 2008 - Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 19:201-216.
Justice in migration.Christine Straehle - 2018 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 48 (2):245-265.
Justice as a virtue: a Thomistic perspective.Jean Porter - 2016 - Grand Rapids, Michigan: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company.


Added to PP

3 (#1,316,202)

6 months
1 (#455,463)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.Thomas S. Kuhn - 1962 - University of Chicago Press.
The Idea of Justice.Amartya Kumar Sen - 2009 - Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Justice as fairness: Political not metaphysical.John Rawls - 1985 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 14 (3):223-251.
Commodities and Capabilities.Amartya Sen - 1985 - Oxford University Press India.
Social Accountability and Corporate Greenwashing.William S. Laufer - 2003 - Journal of Business Ethics 43 (3):253 - 261.

View all 29 references / Add more references