How do medical device manufacturers' websites frame the value of health innovation? An empirical ethics analysis of five Canadian innovations
Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 15 (1):61-77 (2012)
While every health care system stakeholder would seem to be concerned with obtaining the greatest value from a given technology, there is often a disconnect in the perception of value between a technology’s promoters and those responsible for the ultimate decision as to whether or not to pay for it. Adopting an empirical ethics approach, this paper examines how five Canadian medical device manufacturers, via their websites, frame the corporate “value proposition” of their innovation and seek to respond to what they consider the key expectations of their customers. Our analysis shows that the manufacturers’ framing strategies combine claims that relate to valuable socio-technical goals and features such as prevention, efficiency, sense of security, real-time feedback, ease of use and flexibility, all elements that likely resonate with a large spectrum of health care system stakeholders. The websites do not describe, however, how the innovations may impact health care delivery and tend to obfuscate the decisional trade-offs these innovations represent from a health care system perspective. Such framing strategies, we argue, tend to bolster physicians’ and patients’ expectations and provide a large set of stakeholders with powerful rhetorical tools that may influence the health policy arena. Because these strategies are difficult to counter given the paucity of evidence and its limited use in policymaking, establishing sound collective health care priorities will require solid critiques of how certain kinds of medical devices may provide a better (i.e., more valuable) response to health care needs when compared to others.
|Keywords||Medical device industry Health technology Value proposition Socio-technical features Website analysis Empirical ethics|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
What Can the Social Sciences Contribute to the Study of Ethics? Theoretical, Empirical and Substantive Considerations.Erica Haimes - 2002 - Bioethics 16 (2):89–113.
Implicit Normativity in Evidence-Based Medicine: A Plea for Integrated Empirical Ethics Research.Albert C. Molewijk, A. M. Stiggelbout, W. Otten, H. M. Dupuis & Job Kievit - 2003 - Health Care Analysis 11 (1):69-92.
European Values in Bioethics: Why, What, and How to Be Used. [REVIEW]Matti Häyry - 2003 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 24 (3):199-214.
Molecular Medicine and Concepts of Disease: The Ethical Value of a Conceptual Analysis of Emerging Biomedical Technologies. [REVIEW]Marianne Boenink - 2010 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 13 (1):11-23.
What Can the Social Sciences Contribute to the Study of Ethics? Theoretical, Empirical and Substanti.Erica Haimes - 2002 - Bioethics 16 (2):89-113.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Does the Private Finance Initiative Promote Innovation in Health Care? The Case of the British National Health Service.Pythagoras Petratos - 2005 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 30 (6):627 – 642.
Ethics, Economics and the Regulation and Adoption of New Medical Devices: Case Studies in Pelvic Floor Surgery.Sue Ross, Charles Weijer, Amiram Gafni, Ariel Ducey, Carmen Thompson & Rene Lafreniere - 2010 - BMC Medical Ethics 11 (1):14-.
A Critique of the Innovation Argument Against a National Health Program.Alex Rajczi - 2007 - Bioethics 21 (6):316–323.
The United States Health Care System Under Managed Care: How the Commodification of Health Care Distorts Ethics and Threatens Equity. [REVIEW]Larry R. Churchill - 1999 - Health Care Analysis 7 (4):393-411.
Equity and Public Health Care in China.Ren-Zong Qiu - 1989 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 14 (3):283-287.
Who Shall Live?: Health, Economics, and Social Choice.Victor R. Fuchs - 2011 - World Scientific.
Managed Care: How Economic Incentive Reforms Went Wrong.Madison Powers - 1997 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 7 (4):353-360.
Collective Responsibility in Health Care.Lisa H. Newton - 1982 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 7 (1):11-22.
Who Cares? Moral Obligations in Formal and Informal Care Provision in the Light of ICT-Based Home Care.Elin Palm - 2013 - Health Care Analysis 21 (2):171-188.
Medical Ethics and Economics in Health Care.Gavin H. Mooney & Alistair McGuire (eds.) - 1988 - Oxford University Press.
The Medical Profession and the Corporatization of the Health Sector.J. Warren Salmon - 1987 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 8 (1).
Added to index2012-01-17
Total downloads19 ( #259,934 of 2,172,054 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #325,337 of 2,172,054 )
How can I increase my downloads?