Laws of nature and natural laws

Abstract
The relationship between conceptions of law and conceptions of nature is a complex one, and proceeds on what appear to be two distinct fronts. On the one hand, we frequently talk of nature as being lawlike or as obeying laws. On the other hand there are schools of philosophy that seek to justify ethics generally, or legal theory specifically, in conceptions of nature. Questions about the historical origins and development of claims that nature is lawlike are generally treated as entirely distinct from the development of ethical natural law theories. By looking at the many intersections of law and nature in antiquity, this paper shows that such a sharp distinction is overly simplistic, and often relies crucially on the imposition of an artificial and anachronistic suppression of the role of gods or divinity in the worlds of ancient natural philosophy. Furthermore, by tightening up the terms of the debate, we see that the common claim that a conception of [`]laws of nature' only emerges in the Scientific Revolution is built on a superficial reading of the ancient evidence.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1016/j.shpsa.2006.09.001
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 26,188
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
We Have Never Been Modern.Bruno Latour - 1993 - Harvard University Press.
New Work for a Theory of Universals.David Lewis - 1983 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 61 (December):343-377.
Universals and Scientific Realism.D. M. Armstrong - 1978 - Cambridge University Press.
Laws of Nature.Fred I. Dretske - 1977 - Philosophy of Science 44 (2):248-268.
On the Nature of Things. Lucretius - 2001 - Hackett Publishing Company.

View all 28 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Natural Laws in Scientific Practice.Marc Lange - 2000 - Oxford University Press.
The Nature of Natural Laws.Chris Swoyer - 1982 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 60 (3):203 – 223.
Laws of Nature.Norman Swartz - 2001 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research.
Can Bare Dispositions Explain Categorical Regularities?Tyler Hildebrand - 2014 - Philosophical Studies 167 (3):569-584.
Models: The Blueprints for Laws.Nancy Cartwright - 1997 - Philosophy of Science 64 (4):303.
Lange's Challenge: Accounting for Meta-Laws.Z. Yudell - 2013 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 64 (2):347-369.
Some Laws of Nature Are Metaphysically Contingent.John Roberts - 2010 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 88 (3):445-457.
Laws in Nature.Stephen Mumford - 2004 - Routledge.
Armstrong and van Fraassen on Probabilistic Laws of Nature.Duncan Maclean - 2012 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 42 (1):1-13.
Laws of Nature.Fred I. Dretske - 1977 - Philosophy of Science 44 (2):248-268.

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2010-09-02

Total downloads

146 ( #31,193 of 2,153,857 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

8 ( #90,536 of 2,153,857 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums