Mass-Energy-Momentum: Only there Because of Spacetime?

Abstract
I describe how relativistic field theory generalizes the paradigm property of material systems, the possession of mass, to the requirement that they have a mass–energy–momentum density tensor T µ associated with them. I argue that T µ does not represent an intrinsic property of matter. For it will become evident that the definition of T µ depends on the metric field g µ in a variety of ways. Accordingly, since g µ represents the geometry of spacetime itself, the properties of mass, stress, energy, and momentum should not be seen as intrinsic properties of matter, but as relational properties that material systems have only in virtue of their relation to spacetime structure
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1093/bjps/axr003
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 27,590
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Extrinsic Properties.David Lewis - 1983 - Philosophical Studies 44 (2):197-200.
Drawing the Line Between Kinematics and Dynamics in Special Relativity.Michel Janssen - 2009 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 40 (1):26-52.
Interpretations of Einstein's Equation E = Mc.Francisco Flores - 2005 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 19 (3):245 – 260.

View all 14 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
On the Existence of Spacetime Structure.Erik Curiel - forthcoming - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science:axw014.
Mach׳s Principle as Action-at-a-Distance in GR: The Causality Question.Carl Hoefer - 2014 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 48:128-136.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Einstein's 1935 Derivation of E=Mc.Francisco Flores - 1998 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 29 (2):223-243.
Losing Energy in Classical, Relativistic and Quantum Mechanics.David Atkinson - 2007 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 38 (1):170-180.
Interpretations of Einstein's Equation E = Mc.Francisco Flores - 2005 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 19 (3):245 – 260.
Energy Conservation in GTR.C. Hoefer - 2000 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 31 (2):187-199.

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2010-01-31

Total downloads

70 ( #74,907 of 2,168,154 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

2 ( #187,094 of 2,168,154 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums