Sellars (1963) distinguished in Empiricism and Philosophy of Mind between ordinary discourse, which expressed his “manifest image”, and scientific discourse, which articulated his “scientific image” of man-in-the-world in a way that is both central and problematic to the rest of his philosophy. Our contention is that the problematic feature of the distinction results from Sellars theory of inner episodes as theoretical entities. On the other hand, as Sellars attempted to account for our noninferential knowledge of such states, particularly in correspondence with Castañeda, discussed by Lehrer and Stern (2000), he is lead to account of representation of such states that incorporates the states into what Lehrer has called exemplar representation (2004, 2011a) and Ismael reflexive self-description (2007). What is common to the three accounts, with some differences, is that such states may be function reflexively in selfrepresentation. Our argument is that the elaboration of this account, suggested in Sellars, shows how the discourse of the manifest image can be transformed into the discourse of the scientific image as self-representations of scientific entities.
|Keywords||Sellars, Wilfrid Manifest and Scientific Images self-representation|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Identifying and Reconciling Two Images of “Man”.David Hodgson - 2012 - Humana.Mente - Journal of Philosophical Studies 21.
Of Time and the Two Images.Steven F. Savitt - 2012 - Humana.Mente - Journal of Philosophical Studies 21.
Sellarsian Synopsis: Integrating the Images.Jay L. Garfield - 2012 - Humana.Mente - Journal of Philosophical Studies 21.
The Manifest Image ≠ the Commonsense Conceptual Framework (in the Philosophy of Wilfrid Sellars).Andrew Chrucky - manuscript
Ontology and the Completeness of Sellars’s Two Images.Willem deVries - 2012 - Humana.Mente - Journal of Philosophical Studies 21:1-18.
The Eyes Don’T Have It: Fracturing the Scientific and Manifest Images.P. Kyle Stanford - 2012 - Humana.Mente 21:19-44.
How to Be a Kantian and a Naturalist About Human Knowledge.James R. O.’Shea - 2011 - Journal of Philosophical Research 36:327-359.
Why Wilfrid Sellars Is Right.William A. Rottschaefer - 2011 - Journal of Philosophical Research 36:291-325.
Prospects for a Stereoscopic Vision of Our Thinking Nature: On Sellars, Brandom, and Millikan.James R. O'Shea - 2012 - Humana.Mente 21.
Sellars on Perception, Science, and Realism: A Critical Response.Patrick J. Reider - 2012 - Normative Functionalism and the Pittsburgh School.
Added to index2012-05-28
Total downloads61 ( #85,305 of 2,163,567 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #129,234 of 2,163,567 )
How can I increase my downloads?