Health Care Analysis 12 (2):117-129 (2004)

Scientists, bioethicists, and policy makers are currently engaged in a contentious debate about the scientific prospects and morality of efforts to increase human longevity. Some demographers and geneticists suggest that there is little reason to think that it will be possible to significantly extend the human lifespan. Other biodemographers and geneticists argue that there might well be increases in both life expectancy and lifespan. Bioethicists and policy makers are currently addressing many of the ethical, social, and economic issues raised by life extension research. However, the emphasis on philosophical argument supporting or condemning efforts to increase human longevity means that much less attention is currently being given to the factors that might play a role in generating interest in efforts to increase human longevity. This analysis considers three factors that might play a role in heightening public interest in efforts to develop biomedical technologies capable of retarding or reversing aging processes. While discussions of life extension research can seem quite futuristic and impractical, there are some powerful existential factors that might well generate considerable public support for life extension strategies if effective biomedical interventions emerge. Rather than providing philosophical justifications supporting or condemning efforts to increase human longevity, this essay seeks to promote a better understanding of the factors generating contemporary interest in prolonging life and postponing death
Keywords life extension  denial of death  human finitude  aging  longevity  psychological considerations
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1023/B:HCAN.0000041186.34205.98
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 59,735
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

The Will to Health: A Nietzschean Critique.Clinton E. Betts - 2007 - Nursing Philosophy 8 (1):37-48.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Life-Extension and the Malthusian Objection.John K. Davis - 2005 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 30 (1):27 – 44.
Life Extension and Mental Ageing.Christopher Wareham - 2012 - Philosophical Papers 41 (3):455-477.
Reflections on Society, Medicine and Death.Anne Moates - 2006 - Chisholm Health Ethics Bulletin 12 (2):9.
Current Debate on the Ethical Issues of Brain Death.Masahiro Morioka - 2004 - Proceedings of International Congress on Ethical Issues in Brain Death and Organ Transplantation:57-59.
Beyond the Drive to Satisfy Needs: In the Context of Health Care. [REVIEW]Charlotte Delmar - 2013 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 16 (2):141-149.


Added to PP index

Total views
41 ( #253,611 of 2,432,391 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #465,713 of 2,432,391 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes