On the actual impact of deterministic chaos

Synthese 113 (3):357-379 (1997)

The notion of (deterministic) chaos is frequently used in an increasing number of scientific (as well as non-scientific) contexts, ranging from mathematics and the physics of dynamical systems to all sorts of complicated time evolutions, e.g., in chemistry, biology, physiology, economy, sociology, and even psychology. Despite (or just because of) these widespread applications, however, there seem to fluctuate around several misunderstandings about the actual impact of deterministic chaos on several problems of philosophical interest, e.g., on matters of prediction and computability, and determinism and the free will. In order to clarify these points a survey of the meaning variance of the concept(s) of deterministic chaos, or the various contexts in which it is applied, is given, and its actual epistemological implications are extracted. In summary, it turns out that the various concepts of deterministic chaos do not constitute a “new science”, or a “revolutionary” change of the “scientific world picture”. Instead, chaos research provides a sort of toolbox of methods which are certainly useful for a more detailed analysis and understanding of such dynamical systems which are, roughly speaking, endowed with the property of exponential sensitivity on initial conditions. Such a property, then, implies merely one, but quantitatively strong type of limitation of long-time computability and predictability, respectively.
Keywords Philosophy   Philosophy   Epistemology   Logic   Metaphysics   Philosophy of Language
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1023/A:1004944713074
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 44,340
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

What Are the New Implications of Chaos for Unpredictability?Charlotte Werndl - 2009 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 60 (1):195-220.
Stability in Cosmology, From Einstein to Inflation.C. D. McCoy - forthcoming - In Claus Beisbart, Tilman Sauer & Christian Wüthrich (eds.), Thinking About Space and Time. Basel: Birkhäuser.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Zwischen Berechenbarkeit Und Nichtberechenbarkeit. Die Thematisierung der Berechenbarkeit in der Aktuellen Physik Komplexer Systeme.Jan C. Schmidt - 2003 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 34 (1):99-131.
The Construction of Chaos Theory.Yvon Gauthier - 2009 - Foundations of Science 14 (3):153-165.
Defining Chaos.Robert W. Batterman - 1993 - Philosophy of Science 60 (1):43-66.
Determinism in Deterministic Chaos.Roger Jones - 1990 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1990:537-549.
Deterministic Chaos and Computational Complexity: The Case of Methodological Complexity Reductions. [REVIEW]Theodor Leiber - 1999 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 30 (1):87-101.
Deterministisches Chaos: Einige Wissenschaftstheoretisch Interessante Aspekte. [REVIEW]Klaus Jürgen Düsberg - 1995 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 26 (1):11 - 24.


Added to PP index

Total views
59 ( #141,895 of 2,271,599 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #412,706 of 2,271,599 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes

Sign in to use this feature