Turing and the fragility and insubstantiality of evolutionary explanations: A puzzle about the unity of Alan Turing's work with some larger implications

Philosophical Psychology 14 (1):83-94 (2001)
As is well known, Alan Turing drew a line, embodied in the "Turing test," between intellectual and physical abilities, and hence between cognitive and natural sciences. Less familiarly, he proposed that one way to produce a "passer" would be to educate a "child machine," equating the experimenter's improvements in the initial structure of the child machine with genetic mutations, while supposing that the experimenter might achieve improvements more expeditiously than natural selection. On the other hand, in his foundational "On the chemical basis of morphogenesis," Turing insisted that biological explanation clearly confine itself to purely physical and chemical means, eschewing vitalist and teleological talk entirely and hewing to D'Arcy Thompson's line that "evolutionary 'explanations,'" are historical and narrative in character, employing the same intentional and teleological vocabulary we use in doing human history, and hence, while perhaps on occasion of heuristic value, are not part of biology as a natural science. To apply Turing's program to recent issues, the attempt to give foundations to the social and cognitive sciences in the "real science" of evolutionary biology (as opposed to Turing's biology) is neither to give foundations, nor to achieve the unification of the social/cognitive sciences and the natural sciences.
Keywords Ability  Biology  Evolution  Explanation  Physical  Science  Turing, A
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/09515080120033553
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 29,820
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Language as an Instrument of Thought.Eran Asoulin - 2016 - Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics 1 (1):1-23.
Is C Hl Linguistically Specific?Nirmalangshu Mukherji - 2003 - Philosophical Psychology 16 (2):289 – 308.
Dickins, Cosmides, Reasoning, Modularity, and Wason's Task.Justin Leiber - 2005 - Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 35 (3):341–349.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
The Turing Test.B. Jack Copeland - 2000 - Minds and Machines 10 (4):519-539.
Accelerating Turing Machines.B. Jack Copeland - 2002 - Minds and Machines 12 (2):281-300.
Turing's Golden: How Well Turing's Work Stands Today.Justin Leiber - 2006 - Philosophical Psychology 19 (1):13-46.
Turing's Rules for the Imitation Game.Gualtiero Piccinini - 2000 - Minds and Machines 10 (4):573-582.
Is the Human Mind a Turing Machine?D. King - 1996 - Synthese 108 (3):379-89.
Added to PP index

Total downloads
74 ( #76,922 of 2,210,138 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
7 ( #63,455 of 2,210,138 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature