Turing and the fragility and insubstantiality of evolutionary explanations: A puzzle about the unity of Alan Turing's work with some larger implications
Philosophical Psychology 14 (1):83-94 (2001)
As is well known, Alan Turing drew a line, embodied in the "Turing test," between intellectual and physical abilities, and hence between cognitive and natural sciences. Less familiarly, he proposed that one way to produce a "passer" would be to educate a "child machine," equating the experimenter's improvements in the initial structure of the child machine with genetic mutations, while supposing that the experimenter might achieve improvements more expeditiously than natural selection. On the other hand, in his foundational "On the chemical basis of morphogenesis," Turing insisted that biological explanation clearly confine itself to purely physical and chemical means, eschewing vitalist and teleological talk entirely and hewing to D'Arcy Thompson's line that "evolutionary 'explanations,'" are historical and narrative in character, employing the same intentional and teleological vocabulary we use in doing human history, and hence, while perhaps on occasion of heuristic value, are not part of biology as a natural science. To apply Turing's program to recent issues, the attempt to give foundations to the social and cognitive sciences in the "real science" of evolutionary biology (as opposed to Turing's biology) is neither to give foundations, nor to achieve the unification of the social/cognitive sciences and the natural sciences.
|Keywords||Ability Biology Evolution Explanation Physical Science Turing, A|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Language as an Instrument of Thought.Eran Asoulin - 2016 - Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics 1 (1):1-23.
Is C Hl Linguistically Specific?Nirmalangshu Mukherji - 2003 - Philosophical Psychology 16 (2):289 – 308.
The Wiles of Evolutionary Psychology and the Indeterminacy of Selection.Justin Leiber - 2008 - Philosophical Forum 39 (1):53–72.
Dickins, Cosmides, Reasoning, Modularity, and Wason's Task.Justin Leiber - 2005 - Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 35 (3):341–349.
Similar books and articles
Turing's Rules for the Imitation Game.Gualtiero Piccinini - 2000 - Minds and Machines 10 (4):573-582.
On Turing's Turing Test and Why the Matter Matters.Justin Leiber - 1995 - Synthese 104 (1):59-69.
Philosophy, Engineering, Biology, and History: A Vindication of Turing's Views About the Distinction Between the Cognitive and Physical Sciences.Justin Leiber - 2002 - Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence 14 (1):29-37.
Turing's Golden: How Well Turing's Work Stands Today.Justin Leiber - 2006 - Philosophical Psychology 19 (1):13-46.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads60 ( #82,428 of 2,126,571 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #393,634 of 2,126,571 )
How can I increase my downloads?
There are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.