Zygon 48 (4):966-983 (2013)

In this article, I call into question the relevance of emergence theories as presently used by thinkers in the science–religion discussion. Specifically, I discuss theories of emergence that have been used by both religious naturalists and proponents of panentheism. I argue for the following conclusions: (1) If we take the background theory to be metaphysical realism, then there seems to be no positive connection between the reality of emergent properties and the validity of providing reality with a religious interpretation, though one could perhaps construe an argument for the positive ontological status of emergence as a negative case for a religious worldview. (2) To be considered more plausible, religious naturalism should interpret religious discourse from the perspective of pragmatic realism. (3) Panentheistic models of divine causality are unable to avoid ontological dualism. (4) It is not obvious that emergent phenomena and/or properties are nonreducible in the ontological sense of the terms; indeed, the tension between weak and strong emergence makes it difficult for the emergentist to make ontological judgments. My general conclusion is that the concept of emergence has little metaphysical significance in the dialogue between science and theology
Keywords emergence  reductionism  religious naturalism  panentheism
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/zygo.12046
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 70,337
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Existence of God.Richard Swinburne - 2004 - Oxford University Press.
7 The Myth of Nonreductive Materialism.Jaegwon Kim - 1989 - In Paul K. Moser & J. D. Trout (eds.), Contemporary Materialism: A Reader. Routledge. pp. 133.
The Sacred Depths of Nature.Ursula Goodenough - 1998 - Oxford University Press.

View all 17 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Hunky Panentheism.Roberto Rodighiero - 2019 - Sophia 58 (4):581-596.
Religious Naturalism: The Current Debate.Mikael Leidenhag - 2018 - Philosophy Compass 13 (8):e12510.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

A New Problem for Ontological Emergence.D. Heard - 2006 - Philosophical Quarterly 56 (222):55-62.
Computational and Conceptual Emergence.Paul Humphreys - 2008 - Philosophy of Science 75 (5):584-594.
Nonlinearity and Metaphysical Emergence.Jessica M. Wilson - 2013 - In Stephen Mumford & Matthew Tugby (eds.), Metaphysics and Science.
Synchronic and Diachronic Emergence.Paul Humphreys - 2008 - Minds and Machines 18 (4):431-442.
The Reemergence of 'Emergence'.Bryon Cunningham - 2001 - Philosophy of Science 68 (3):S63-S75.
Emergence in Effective Field Theories.Jonathan Bain - 2013 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 3 (3):257-273.


Added to PP index

Total views
57 ( #199,867 of 2,508,119 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,711 of 2,508,119 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes