Journal of Buddhist Ethics 26:240-89 (2019)

Authors
Amod Lele
Boston University
Abstract
Contemporary engaged Buddhist scholars typically claim either that Buddhism always endorsed social activism, or that its non-endorsement of such activism represented an unwitting lack of progress. This article examines several classical South Asian Buddhist texts that explicitly reject social and political activism. These texts argue for this rejection on the grounds that the most important sources of suffering are not something that activism can fix, and that political involvement interferes with the tranquility required for liberation. The article then examines the history of engaged Buddhism in order to identify why this rejection of activism has not yet been taken sufficiently seriously.
Keywords Engaged Buddhism  activism  Buddhist ethics
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Chan Wai Liu Yun.Zaixuan Chen - 2007 - Zong Jiao Wen Hua Chu Ban She.
Zhu Xi's Grasp of Buddhism and its Limitations.Chen-Feng Tsai - 2018 - Contemporary Chinese Thought 49 (3-4):186-206.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2019-11-19

Total views
831 ( #7,399 of 2,461,424 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
180 ( #2,913 of 2,461,424 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes