In Daniel Schubbe, Jens Lemanski & Rico Hauswald (eds.), Warum ist überhaupt etwas und nicht nichts? Wandel und Variationen einer Frage. Hamburg: Meiner. pp. 23–65 (2013)

Authors
Jens Lemanski
Fernuniversität Hagen
Abstract
Inspired by various research results on the history of philosophy that have not yet been compiled, the paper pursues the thesis that the question "Why is there something rather than nothing" was formulated long before Leibniz. In reviewing this thesis, the 'fundamental question' is differentiated into two individual questions: "Why is there something at all" and 'Why isn't rather nothing?". On the basis of this systematic distinction, the paper examines the history of philosophy from early history to scholasticism with regard to the occurrence of the above mentioned individual questions and their connection to the fundamental question.
Keywords Ontology  Antiquity  Medieval Philosophy  Metaphysics  Big Questions  Existence  Being  Nothingness  Contingency
Categories (categorize this paper)
Buy the book Find it on Amazon.com
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Translate to english
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Hempel, Stegmüller und die Leibniz-Bedingung.Franz Schupp - 1978 - Studia Leibnitiana 10 (1):116 - 122.
Moorova filosofická metoda.Prokop Sousedík - 2005 - Studia Neoaristotelica 2 (2):192-213.
Notes on the Text of Pliny's Epistles.J. P. Postgate - 1922 - Classical Quarterly 16 (3-4):175-.
Notes on the Text of Pliny's Epistles.J. P. Postgate - 1922 - Classical Quarterly 16 (3-4):175-176.
Schelling’s Original Insight.C. Jeffrey Kinlaw - 2003 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 77 (2):213-232.
" Nihil " Cathare Et " Nihil " Augustinien.Goulven Madec - 1977 - Revue d' Etudes Augustiniennes Et Patristiques 23 (1-2):92-112.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2018-09-03

Total views
36 ( #281,113 of 2,403,028 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
17 ( #43,239 of 2,403,028 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes