In Defense of Nudging When the Stakes Are High

American Journal of Bioethics 19 (5):62-63 (2019)

Abstract
Volume 19, Issue 5, May 2019, Page 62-63.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1080/15265161.2019.1588422
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 40,183
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

In Defense of Nudge–Autonomy Compatibility.J. S. Blumenthal-Barby & Aanand D. Naik - 2015 - American Journal of Bioethics 15 (10):45-47.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Authenticity, Best Interest, and Clinical Nudging.Søren Holm - 2017 - Hastings Center Report 47 (2):38-40.
Nudging for Liberals.Andrés Moles - 2015 - Social Theory and Practice 41 (4):644-667.
Stakes, Scales, and Skepticism.Kathryn Francis, Philip Beaman & Nat Hansen - forthcoming - Ergo: An Open Access Journal of Philosophy.
Epistemic Anxiety and Adaptive Invariantism.Jennifer Nagel - 2010 - Philosophical Perspectives 24 (1):407-435.
Nudging and Informed Consent.Shlomo Cohen - 2013 - American Journal of Bioethics 13 (6):3-11.
Nudging, Informed Consent and Bullshit.William Simkulet - 2018 - Journal of Medical Ethics 44 (8):536-542.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2019-05-09

Total views
9 ( #734,699 of 2,237,432 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
9 ( #155,174 of 2,237,432 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature