Abstract
In this study, we develop a theoretical model of monetary intelligence (MI), explore the extent to which individuals’ meaning of money is related to the pursuit of materialistic purposes, and test our model using the whole sample and across college major and gender. We select the 15-item love of money (LOM) construct—Factors Good, Evil (Affective), Budget (Behavioral), Achievement, and Power (Cognitive)—from the Money Ethic Scale and Factors Success and Centrality and two indicators—from the Materialism Scale. Based on our data collected from 330 university students in Czech Republic, we provide the following findings. First, our formative models are superior to our reflective models. Second, for the reflective model, money represents Power, Good, Achievement, and not Evil, in the context of materialism. Our formative model suggests that those who pursuit materialism cherish Achievement (vanity) but Budget their money poorly. Third, multi-group analyses illustrate that humanities students (62.4 % female) consider money as Evil and Budget their money poorly, while those in natural sciences (37.6 % female) do not. Further, men are obsessed with Achievement, whereas women do not Budget their money properly, suggesting reflective temptation for males and impulsive temptation for females. Our novel discoveries shed new lights on the relationships between LOM and materialism and offer practical implications to the field of consumer behavior and business ethics
Keywords Meaning of money  Monetary intelligence  Love of money (LOM)  Materialism  Power  Budget  Achievement  Vanity  Reflective-impulsive temptation  Gender  College major
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2014
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1007/s10551-013-1915-8
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 60,750
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Principles of Psychology.William James - 1890 - Dover Publications.

View all 16 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

View all 16 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Money and the Autonomy Instinct.Siegfried Dewitte - 2006 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (2):184-185.
Endogenous Money and David Hume.Maria Pia Paganelli - 2006 - Eastern Economic Journal.
Money and the Medical Profession.William F. May - 1997 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 7 (1):1-13.
The Theory and Empirical Credibility of Commodity Money.John Weeks - 2012 - Science and Society 76 (1):66 - 94.
Money in Capitalism or Capitalist Money?Dick Bryan & Michael Rafferty - 2006 - Historical Materialism 14 (1):75-95.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-11-22

Total views
65 ( #160,016 of 2,438,717 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #436,491 of 2,438,717 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes