On Ignorance: A Reply to Peels

Philosophia 39 (2):335-344 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Rik Peels has ingeniously argued that ignorance is not equivalent to the lack or absence of knowledge. In this response, I defend the Standard View of Ignorance according to which they are equivalent. In the course of doing so, some important lessons will emerge concerning the nature of ignorance and its relationship to knowledge

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 107,099

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Lucky Ignorance, Modality and Lack of Knowledge.Oscar A. Piedrahita - 2021 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly (3).
What is ignorance?Rik Peels - 2010 - Philosophia 38 (1):57-67.
Ignorance and Incompetence.Berit Brogaard - forthcoming - In Rik Peels and Martijn Blaauw, Igorance. Cambridge University Press.
When ignorance excuses.Pierre Le Morvan - 2018 - Ratio 32 (1):22-31.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-12-10

Downloads
144 (#166,938)

6 months
7 (#735,900)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Brainstorms.Daniel C. Dennett - 1978 - MIT Press.
Brainstorms.Daniel Dennett - 1978 - Philosophy of Science 47 (2):326-327.
Reliabilism and the Value of Knowledge.Alvin I. Goldman & Erik J. Olsson - 2009 - In Adrian Haddock, Alan Millar & Duncan Pritchard, Epistemic value. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 19-41.
Knowledge, Perception, and Memory.Don Locke - 1976 - Philosophical Quarterly 26 (104):279-280.

View all 9 references / Add more references