Studia Humana 9 (3/4):104-119 (2020)

Michał Dobrzański
University of Warsaw
Jens Lemanski
Fernuniversität Hagen
Reism or concretism are the labels for a position in ontology and semantics that is represented by various philosophers. As Kazimierz Ajdukiewicz and Jan Woleński have shown, there are two dimensions with which the abstract expression of reism can be made concrete: The ontological dimension of reism says that only things exist; the semantic dimension of reism says that all concepts must be reduced to concrete terms in order to be meaningful. In this paper we argue for the following two theses: (1) Arthur Schopenhauer has advocated a reistic philosophy of language which says that all concepts must ultimately be based on concrete intuition in order to be meaningful. (2) In his semantics, Schopenhauer developed a theory of logic diagrams that can be interpreted by modern means in order to concretize the abstract position of reism. Thus we are not only enhancing Jan Woleński’s list of well-known reists, but we are also adding a diagrammatic dimension to concretism, represented by Schopenhauer.
Keywords Philosophy of Language  Logic  Semantics  Logic Diagrams  Reism  Concretism  Abstraction  Arthur Schopenhauer  Lvov-Warsaw School  Jan Wolenski
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.2478/sh-2020-0030
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Troubles with (the Concept of) Truth in Mathematics.Roman Murawski - 2006 - Logic and Logical Philosophy 15 (4):285-303.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Schopenhauer Diagrams for Conceptual Analysis.Michał Dobrzański & Jens Lemanski - 2020 - In Ahti Veikko Pietarinen, P. Chapman, Leonie Bosveld-de Smet, Valeria Giardino, James Corter & Sven Linker (eds.), Diagrammatic Representation and Inference. Diagrams 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 12169. Cham, Schweiz: pp. 281-288.
On the Phases of Reism.Barry Smith - 1990 - In A. Chrudzimski & D. Łukasiewicz (eds.), Actions, Products, and Things: Brentano and Polish Philosophy. Ontos. pp. 137--183.
Naturalism and Reism.Jan Woleński - 2007 - Dialogue and Universalism 17 (1/2):13-19.
Language, Logic, and Mathematics in Schopenhauer.Jens Lemanski (ed.) - 2020 - Basel, Schweiz: Birkhäuser.
Kotarbiński’s Strong Minimalist Ontology.Anna C. Zielinska - 2015 - In Denis Seron, Sebastien Richard & Bruno Leclercq (eds.), Objects and Pseudo-Objects Ontological Deserts and Jungles from Brentano to Carnap. Berlin: De Gruyter. pp. 17-50.
Logik und Eristische Dialektik.Jens Lemanski - 2018 - In Daniel Schubbe & Matthias Koßler (eds.), Schopenhauer-Handbuch: Leben – Werk – Wirkung. Stuttgart, Deutschland: Springer. pp. 160-165.
Thought and Thing: Brentano's Reism as Truthmaker Nominalism.Uriah Kriegel - 2015 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 90 (3):153-180.
Means or End? On the Valuation of Logic Diagrams.Jens Lemanski - 2016 - Logic-Philosophical Studies 14:98-122.
Reism and Le'sniewski's Ontology.Jan Wole'nski - 1986 - History and Philosophy of Logic 7 (2):167-176.
On What There Is Not—a Vindication of Reism.Jan Czerniawski - 1998 - In Katarzyna Kijania-Placek & Jan Woleński (eds.), The Lvov-Warsaw School and Contemporary Philosophy. Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 313--317.
The Dispute Over Reism.Roberto Poli - 1993 - In Francesco Coniglione, Roberto Poli & Jan Wolenski (eds.), Polish Scientific Philosophy: The Lvov-Warsaw School. Rodopi.


Added to PP index

Total views
87 ( #120,014 of 2,438,732 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
60 ( #11,492 of 2,438,732 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes