Reism, Concretism and Schopenhauer Diagrams

Studia Humana 9 (3/4):104-119 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Reism or concretism are the labels for a position in ontology and semantics that is represented by various philosophers. As Kazimierz Ajdukiewicz and Jan Woleński have shown, there are two dimensions with which the abstract expression of reism can be made concrete: The ontological dimension of reism says that only things exist; the semantic dimension of reism says that all concepts must be reduced to concrete terms in order to be meaningful. In this paper we argue for the following two theses: (1) Arthur Schopenhauer has advocated a reistic philosophy of language which says that all concepts must ultimately be based on concrete intuition in order to be meaningful. (2) In his semantics, Schopenhauer developed a theory of logic diagrams that can be interpreted by modern means in order to concretize the abstract position of reism. Thus we are not only enhancing Jan Woleński’s list of well-known reists, but we are also adding a diagrammatic dimension to concretism, represented by Schopenhauer.

Similar books and articles

Schopenhauer Diagrams for Conceptual Analysis.Michał Dobrzański & Jens Lemanski - 2020 - In Ahti Veikko Pietarinen, P. Chapman, Leonie Bosveld-de Smet, Valeria Giardino, James Corter & Sven Linker (eds.), Diagrammatic Representation and Inference. Diagrams 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 12169. Cham, Schweiz: pp. 281-288.
On the Phases of Reism.Barry Smith - 1990 - In A. Chrudzimski & D. Łukasiewicz (eds.), Actions, Products, and Things: Brentano and Polish Philosophy. Ontos. pp. 137--183.
Naturalism and Reism.Jan Woleński - 2007 - Dialogue and Universalism 17 (1/2):13-19.
Language, Logic, and Mathematics in Schopenhauer.Jens Lemanski (ed.) - 2020 - Basel, Schweiz: Birkhäuser.
Kotarbiński’s Strong Minimalist Ontology.Anna C. Zielinska - 2015 - In Denis Seron, Sebastien Richard & Bruno Leclercq (eds.), Objects and Pseudo-Objects Ontological Deserts and Jungles from Brentano to Carnap. Berlin: De Gruyter. pp. 17-50.
Concept Diagrams and the Context Principle.Jens Lemanski - 2020 - In Language, Logic, and Mathematics in Schopenhauer. Cham, Schweiz: Birkhäuser (Springer nature). pp. 47-73.
Logik und Eristische Dialektik.Jens Lemanski - 2018 - In Daniel Schubbe & Matthias Koßler (eds.), Schopenhauer-Handbuch: Leben – Werk – Wirkung. Stuttgart, Deutschland: Springer. pp. 160-165.
Thought and Thing: Brentano's Reism as Truthmaker Nominalism.Uriah Kriegel - 2015 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 90 (3):153-180.
Means or end? On the Valuation of Logic Diagrams.Jens Lemanski - 2016 - Logic-Philosophical Studies 14:98-122.
Reism and Le'sniewski's Ontology.Jan Woleński - 1986 - History and Philosophy of Logic 7 (2):167-176.
On What There Is Not—a Vindication of Reism.Jan Czerniawski - 1998 - In Katarzyna Kijania-Placek & Jan Woleński (eds.), The Lvov-Warsaw School and Contemporary Philosophy. Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 313--317.
The Dispute over Reism.Roberto Poli - 1993 - In Francesco Coniglione, Roberto Poli & Jan Wolenski (eds.), Polish Scientific Philosophy: The Lvov-Warsaw School. Rodopi.


Added to PP

263 (#51,186)

6 months
75 (#20,556)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Michał Dobrzański
University of Warsaw
Jens Lemanski
University of Münster

Citations of this work

Arthur Schopenhauer: Logic and Dialectic.Jens Lemanski - 2023 - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Der japanische Garten im System Schopenhauers.Jens Lemanski - 2021 - Schopenhauer Jahrbuch 102:131-159.

Add more citations