Theory and Decision 51 (2/4):329-349 (2001)
This paper proposes an exploration of the methodology of utility functions that distinguishes interpretation from representation. While representation univocally assigns numbers to the entities of the domain of utility functions, interpretation relates these entities with empirically observable objects of choice. This allows us to make explicit the standard interpretation of utility functions which assumes that two objects have the same utility if and only if the individual is indifferent among them. We explore the underlying assumptions of such an hypothesis and propose a non-standard interpretation according to which objects of choice have a well-defined utility although individuals may vary in the way they treat these objects in a specific context. We provide examples of such a methodological approach that may explain some reversal of preferences and suggest possible mathematical formulations for further research
|Keywords||Utility representation interpretation preference reversal|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Framing Effects as Violations of Extensionality.Sacha Bourgeois-Gironde & Raphaël Giraud - 2009 - Theory and Decision 67 (4):385-404.
Similar books and articles
Coherent Choice Functions Under Uncertainty.Teddy Seidenfeld, Mark J. Schervish & Joseph B. Kadane - 2009 - Synthese 172 (1):157 - 176.
Anxiety and Decision Making with Delayed Resolution of Uncertainty.George Wu - 1999 - Theory and Decision 46 (2):159-199.
Facts, Norms and Expected Utility Functions.Pierre-Charles Pradier, Teira David & Sophie Jallais - 2008 - History of the Human Sciences 21 (2):45-62.
Revealed Preference and Expected Utility.Stephen A. Clark - 2000 - Theory and Decision 49 (2):159-174.
Must Rational Intentions Maximize Utility?Ralph Wedgwood - forthcoming - Philosophical Explorations.
Interpersonal Utility in Principles of Social Choice.Paul Weirich - 1984 - Erkenntnis 21 (3):295 - 317.
A Note on Concave Utility Functions.Martin M. Monti, Simon Grant & Daniel N. Osherson - 2005 - Mind and Society 4 (1):85-96.
Mean Utility Preserving Increases in Risk for State Dependent Utility Functions.Michel Demers - 1987 - Theory and Decision 23 (2):113-128.
A Process Approach to the Utility for Gambling.Marc le Menestrel - 2001 - Theory and Decision 50 (3):249-262.
Utility, Informativity and Protocols.van Rooy Robert - 2004 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 33 (4):389-419.
Added to index2010-09-02
Total downloads50 ( #103,732 of 2,163,662 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #62,625 of 2,163,662 )
How can I increase my downloads?