Taylor’s defenses of two traditional arguments for the existence of god

Sophia 29 (1):31-41 (1990)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In 1963, in the first edition of his book Metaphysics, Richard Taylor presented two interesting defenses of the cosmological and design arguments for the existence of God. Surprisingly, even after the third edition has appeared, his defense of the cosmological argument has passed relatively unnoticed, and while his novel account of the argument from design has provoked a fair amount of critical discussion, little attention is given to Taylor's reply contained in the same text. In this paper, we attempt to show that Taylor's defenses contain some new and interesting moves. However, we conclude that they ultimately fail to provide rational grounds for belief in the existence of God.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,642

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Reconsidering Taylor's Design Argument.Mehrzad Ali Moin - 2024 - History of Philosophy Quarterly 41 (2):143-163.
On the nature and existence of God.Richard M. Gale - 1991 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
The existence of God.Richard Swinburne - 1979 - New York: Oxford University Press.
The Existence of God.Richard Swinburne - 1979 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press UK.
Cosmological Arguments on the Existence of God According to Al-Qadi ‘Abd Al-Jabbar.Mohd Radhi Ibrahim - 2018 - Proceedings of the XXIII World Congress of Philosophy 17:27-30.
The Cosmological Argument in Kant and Islamic Philosophers.A. Far - unknown - Kheradnameh Sadra Quarterly 28.
Problem of Evil.Michael Tooley - 2007 - In T. Flynn (ed.), The New Encyclopedia of Unbelief. Prometheus. pp. 302-10.
Hume and Proofs for the Existence of God.Martin Bell - 2016 - In Paul Russell (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of David Hume. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-02

Downloads
11 (#351,772)

6 months
75 (#214,440)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Pieranna Garavaso
University of Minnesota, Morris

Citations of this work

Reconsidering Taylor's Design Argument.Mehrzad Ali Moin - 2024 - History of Philosophy Quarterly 41 (2):143-163.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Cosmological Argument.Pheroze S. Wadia - 1975 - Religious Studies 11 (4):411 - 420.
Purpose, feedback, and evolution.Arthur E. Falk - 1981 - Philosophy of Science 48 (2):198-217.
The Cosmological Argument1: PHEROZE S. WADIA.Pheroze S. Wadia - 1975 - Religious Studies 11 (4):411-420.
On a new argument from design.Jan Narveson - 1965 - Journal of Philosophy 62 (9):223-229.
A realistic argument for belief in the existence of God.Richard E. Creel - 1979 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 10 (4):233 - 253.

View all 6 references / Add more references