Sanctuary as democratic non-cooperation

Sage Publications: Politics, Philosophy and Economics 21 (3):291-312 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Politics, Philosophy & Economics, Volume 21, Issue 3, Page 291-312, August 2022. Across North America, Europe and Latin America, multiple sub-state jurisdictions have declared themselves to be migrant “sanctuaries”. By adopting sanctuary status, sub-state jurisdictions signal their welcoming attitude towards migrants as well their opposition to the state-level policies that target them for exclusion. In this article, I examine the place of sanctuary in the broader literature of political resistance and opposition in democratic states, and then whether it can be justified all things considered. I locate my examination in the political theory of federalism, to identify an expectation of cooperation – which, it appears, sanctuary jurisdictions are refusing to accept, usually with respect to immigration enforcement efforts. I refer to this form of opposition as “democratic non-cooperation” and identify its key features. I describe a “cooperation continuum”, to suggest that non-cooperation takes four main forms – evasion, non-engagement, disruption and obstruction – which I describe both in general terms and in relation to sanctuary practices in particular. Finally, I observe that the form of opposition that sanctuary is, is not limited to sanctuary: that is, there are other cases of this form of opposition in other policy domains, and moreover, not all of the objectives taken by those who deploy this form of opposition are progressive. Ultimately, this article's central contribution is to fleshing out modes of opposition in democratic spaces in general, by examining the morality of sanctuary actions taken around the world.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,088

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Sanctuary as democratic non-cooperation.Patti Tamara Lenard - 2022 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 21 (3):291-312.
Sanctuary Cities and Republican Liberty.J. Matthew Hoye - 2020 - Politics and Society 48 (1):67-97.
How Can Sanctuary Policies be Justified?Shelley Wilcox - 2019 - Public Affairs Quarterly 33 (2):89-113.
Cultural Relativism and Philosophy. [REVIEW]Richard Beatch - 1994 - Review of Metaphysics 47 (3):606-608.
Democratic Citizenship and Denationalization.Patti Tamara Lenard - 2018 - American Political Science Review 112 (1):99-111.
Sanctuary Cities and Non-Refoulement.Michael Blake & Blake Hereth - 2020 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 23 (2):457-474.
Democracy, Identity, and Politics.Michele M. Moody-Adams - 2018 - Res Philosophica 95 (2):199-218.
Moral sanctuary in business: A comment on the possibility.Donald X. Burt - 1986 - Journal of Business Ethics 5 (3):209 - 211.
Cooperation, competition, and democracy.Shaomeng Li - 2011 - Frontiers of Philosophy in China 6 (2):273-283.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-05-05

Downloads
3 (#1,557,623)

6 months
2 (#785,137)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Patti Tamara Lenard
University of Ottawa

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

A Theory of Justice: Revised Edition.John Rawls - 1999 - Harvard University Press.
Moral prejudices: essays on ethics.Annette Baier - 1994 - Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Resistance to Unjust Immigration Restrictions.Javier Hidalgo - 2015 - Journal of Political Philosophy 23 (4):450-470.
The Practice of Global Citizenship.Luis Cabrera - 2010 - Cambridge University Press.

View all 16 references / Add more references