The darwin/gray correspondence 1857–1869: An intelligent discussion about chance and design

Perspectives on Science 18 (4):456-479 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This essay outlines one aspect of a larger collaboration with John Beatty and Alan Love.2 The project’s focus is philosophical, but for reasons that will become clear momentarily, the method of approach is historical. All three of us share the conviction that philosophical issues concerning the foundations of the sciences are often illuminated by investigating their history. It is my hope that this paper both provides support for that thesis, and illustrates it. The focal philosophical issue can be stated in the form of a puzzle about contemporary discussions of the conceptual foundations of evolutionary theory. The role of the concepts of “chance” and “randomness” in that theory is a significant part of ..

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 97,119

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-10-03

Downloads
95 (#187,865)

6 months
18 (#236,616)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

James G. Lennox
University of Pittsburgh

References found in this work

Chance and natural selection.John Beatty - 1984 - Philosophy of Science 51 (2):183-211.
Darwin was a teleologist.James G. Lennox - 1993 - Biology and Philosophy 8 (4):409-421.
Principles of Geology.Charles Lyell & G. L. Herrier Davies - 1994 - Annals of Science 51 (1):100.
The Correspondence of Charles Darwin.Charles Darwin, Frederick Burkhardt & Sydney Smith - 1988 - Journal of the History of Biology 21 (2):343-349.
The Ninth Bridgewater Treatise.Charles Babbage - 2009 - Cambridge University Press.

View all 12 references / Add more references