Immigration Controls: Why the Self‐Determination Argument Is Self‐Defeating
Journal of Social Philosophy 47 (3):309-331 (2016)
Abstract
In philosophical debates about immigration, one of the most prominent arguments asserts that a state’s citizenry has a right to unilaterally control its territorial borders by virtue of its right to self-determination. This is the self-determination argument. The present article demonstrates that this argument is internally undermined by the Coercion Principle, according to which all persons subjected to coercive political power are entitled to an equal say in exercising that power. First, whichever way the self-determination argument identifies the relevant self-determining self, it is bound to rely on the Coercion Principle. Specifying the self politically involves appealing to the Coercion Principle, as it is a core principle of democratic theory. Alternatively, specifying a pre-political self fails to circumvent this problem, as a similar issue arises further down the argumentative line, when inferring the right to unilaterally control borders from the right to self-determination. Finally, since border controls coerce would-be immigrants, this reliance on the Coercion Principle renders the self-determination argument self-defeating.Author's Profile
DOI
10.1111/josp.12156
My notes
Similar books and articles
Taking Moral Equality Seriously: Egalitarianism and Immigration Controls.Phillip Cole - 2012 - Journal of International Political Theory 8 (1-2):121-134.
Immigration and self-determination.Bas van der Vossen - 2015 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 14 (3):270-290.
Epistemically self-defeating arguments and skepticism about intuition.Paul Silva - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 164 (3):579-589.
The Ethics of Immigration: Self‐Determination and the Right to Exclude.Sarah Fine - 2013 - Philosophy Compass 8 (3):254-268.
Immigration and Democratic Principles: On Carens’ Ethics of Immigration.Sarah Song - 2016 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 33 (4):450-456.
Domination and migration: an alternative approach to the legitimacy of migration controls.Iseult Honohan - 2014 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 17 (1):31-48.
On Indirectly Self-defeating Moral Theories.Eric Wiland - 2008 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 5 (3):384-393.
Latino/a Immigration: A Refutation of the Social Trust Argument.José Jorge Mendoza - 2015 - In Harald Bauder & Christian Matheis (eds.), Migration Policy and Practice: Interventions and Solutions. Palgrave-Macmillan. pp. 37-57.
Liberalism or Immigration Restrictions, But Not Both.Javier Hidalgo & Christopher Freiman - 2016 - Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy 10 (2):1-22.
Detaining Asylum Seekers and Immigrants: A Normative Introduction, New Challenges in Immigration Theory.Stephanie J. Silverman - 2015 - In Crispino Akakpo & Patti Lenard (eds.), New Challenges in Immigration Theory. Routledge.
The Environmental Argument for Reducing Immigration into the United States.Philip Cafaro & Winthrop Staples Iii - 2009 - Environmental Ethics 31 (1):5-30.
Analytics
Added to PP
2016-09-06
Downloads
26 (#448,666)
6 months
2 (#297,033)
2016-09-06
Downloads
26 (#448,666)
6 months
2 (#297,033)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Border Coercion and ‘Democratic Legitimacy’: On Abizadeh’s Argument Against Current Regimes of Border Control.Uwe Steinhoff - 2020 - Res Publica 26 (2):281-292.