Journal of Social Philosophy 47 (3):309-331 (2016)

Authors
Maxime C. Lepoutre
Oxford University
Abstract
In philosophical debates about immigration, one of the most prominent arguments asserts that a state’s citizenry has a right to unilaterally control its territorial borders by virtue of its right to self-determination. This is the self-determination argument. The present article demonstrates that this argument is internally undermined by the Coercion Principle, according to which all persons subjected to coercive political power are entitled to an equal say in exercising that power. First, whichever way the self-determination argument identifies the relevant self-determining self, it is bound to rely on the Coercion Principle. Specifying the self politically involves appealing to the Coercion Principle, as it is a core principle of democratic theory. Alternatively, specifying a pre-political self fails to circumvent this problem, as a similar issue arises further down the argumentative line, when inferring the right to unilaterally control borders from the right to self-determination. Finally, since border controls coerce would-be immigrants, this reliance on the Coercion Principle renders the self-determination argument self-defeating.
Keywords Immigration  Global justice  Coercion  Democratic theory
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/josp.12156
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 65,740
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Taking Moral Equality Seriously: Egalitarianism and Immigration Controls.Phillip Cole - 2012 - Journal of International Political Theory 8 (1-2):121-134.
Immigration and Self-Determination.Bas van der Vossen - 2015 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 14 (3):270-290.
Nationalism and Immigration.Chaim Gans - 1998 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 1 (2):159-180.
Self-Defeating Arguments.John L. Pollock - 1991 - Minds and Machines 1 (4):367-392.
Domination and Migration: An Alternative Approach to the Legitimacy of Migration Controls.Iseult Honohan - 2014 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 17 (1):31-48.
On Indirectly Self-Defeating Moral Theories.Eric Wiland - 2008 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 5 (3):384-393.
Immigration, Association, and the Family.Matthew Lister - 2010 - Law and Philosophy 29 (6):717-745.
Liberalism or Immigration Restrictions, But Not Both.Javier Hidalgo & Christopher Freiman - 2016 - Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy 10 (2):1-22.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2016-09-06

Total views
21 ( #522,025 of 2,462,842 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #449,387 of 2,462,842 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes