American Journal of Bioethics 9 (10):53-54 (2009)

Authors
Abstract
Gesundheit and colleagues offer dramatic examples of the medical treatment of terrorists but then pose the suggestion that those who engage in terrorism forfeit their right to medical care, and, consequently, that physicians have no obligation to treat them. Their argument presupposes that a physician’s obligation to provide medical care depends on the patients’ right to health care. Therefore, someone who commits heinous and abhorrent acts thereby waives the right to health care and the physicians’ duty to provide health care might consequently be absolved. This view may appeal to physicians who have experienced the complexity and discomfort of treating someone whose morality or even humanity they question, such as a rapist, a serial killer, or a perpetrator of genocide. However we have grounds to believe that the duty of physicians to treat is not based on the moral worth of patients, but rather on the duties that physicians have, and this notion renders any concern about the unacceptability of any person’s behavior irrelevant in determining whether to provide treatment. We will first argue that not all duties are directly derived from rights, and then illustrate how deontological views, along with common views on the role morality of physicians, provide a basis for offering indiscriminate medical care. Second, we will discuss the physician’s role in the context of war, and offer one compelling moral reason on the basis of which warfare norms do indeed obligate physicians to extend their duty to care toward enemies, terrorists included, independently of whatever right they maintain.
Keywords torture  complicity  medical duties
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/15265160902998814
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 63,274
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Obligations of Health Workers to “Terrorists”.John Lunstroth - 2009 - American Journal of Bioethics 9 (10):45-48.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Tortured Patient: A Medical Dilemma.Chiara Lepora & Joseph Millum - 2011 - Hastings Center Report 41 (3):38-47.
Between Beneficence and Justice: The Ethics of Stewardship in Medicine.L. A. Jansen - 2013 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 38 (1):50-63.
HIV and the Obligation to Treat.Mark Sheldon - 1990 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 11 (3).
Trust in Managed Care Organizations.Allen Buchanan - 2000 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 10 (3):189-212.
Euthanasia and Physicians' Moral Duties.Gary Seay - 2005 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 30 (5):517 – 533.
Health Versus Harm: Euthanasia and Physicians' Duties.J. L. A. Garcia - 2007 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 32 (1):7 – 24.
The Desired Moral Attitude of the Physician: (I) Empathy. [REVIEW]Petra Gelhaus - 2012 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 15 (2):103-113.
Professional Autonomy in Belgium.Herman Nys & Paul Schotsmans - 2000 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 21 (5):425-439.
Medical Samaritans: Is There A Duty To Treat?Kevin Williams - 2001 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 21 (3):393-413.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2010-09-14

Total views
55 ( #193,436 of 2,448,683 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #447,803 of 2,448,683 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes