The two-way doomsday machine

Think 15 (42):9-14 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

A thought experiment invites us to examine our intuitive beliefs about the reality of the past, the reality of the future, and our capacity to affect either, and provides a test of our attitudes towards life. Given an inescapable choice and extraordinary power, would it be our duty to destroy the whole of reality, both past and future?

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

If You Like It, Does It Matter if It’s Real?Felipe De Brigard - 2010 - Philosophical Psychology 23 (1):43-57.
The Doomsday Machine.Lawrence Alexander - 1980 - The Monist 63 (2):199-227.
Truthmakers, the past, and the future.Josh Parsons - 2005 - In Helen Beebee & Julian Dodd (eds.), Truthmakers: The Contemporary Debate. Clarendon Press.
The doomsday argument without knowledge of birth rank.Bradley Monton - 2003 - Philosophical Quarterly 53 (210):79–82.
The Quantum Doomsday Argument.Alastair Wilson - 2017 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 68 (2).
What's Wrong with the Experience Machine?Christopher Belshaw - 2012 - European Journal of Philosophy 22 (4):573-592.
Preimplantation Genetic Testing: Neither Doomsday Machine Nor Panacea For Potential Parents.Linda Hasadsri - 1998 - Eubios Journal of Asian and International Bioethics 8 (3):81-82.
Past longevity as evidence for the future.Ronald Pisaturo - 2009 - Philosophy of Science 76 (1):73-100.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-12-09

Downloads
61 (#253,934)

6 months
3 (#902,269)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Robin Le Poidevin
University of Leeds

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references