An argument against a legal duty to rescue

Journal of Social Philosophy 26 (1):16-38 (1995)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Indeed, to a layperson reading the relevant case law, it almost seems that the courts sometimes try to make this principle seem as shocking as possible. In one decision that is often cited, a unanimous state supreme court held that, not only did an eight year old boy have no right to be rescued by the defendant from having his hand caught in a machine in the defendant's factory, but he (the boy, as a trespasser) would even have been liable for damages to the defendant in this case had his hand, in being ground up by the defendant's machine, damaged the machine

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 76,168

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-10

Downloads
56 (#212,586)

6 months
1 (#448,551)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Lester Hunt
University of Wisconsin, Madison

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references