How the Calvin Hayes Review is Wrong about Libertarianism


The review cites the “Open Society” twice in its title—and is clearly pro-Popperian—but then fails to mention the fourteen-point list, and surrounding discussion, that explicitly compares Popper’s critical rationalism with anarcho-libertarianism (strong similarities) and liberal democracy (strong dissimilarities); EfL, pp.135-142. If the review had engaged more closely with the arguments of EfL and been more informed by the relevant social scientific literature, then it would probably have found the anarcho-libertarian case to be far more robust and realistic than such a cursory dismissal can hope to refute.



External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Community in a new libertarianism: Rejoinder to Legutko.Peter Simpson - 1995 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 9 (3):427-429.
What's wrong with Libertarianism. [REVIEW]Jeffrey Friedman - 1997 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 11 (3):407-467.
What's Wrong with Libertarianism: A Meritocratic Diagnosis.Thomas Mulligan - 2017 - In Jason Brennan, David Schmidtz & Bas van der Vossen (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Libertarianism. New York: Routledge. pp. 77-91.


Added to PP

247 (#72,554)

6 months
74 (#51,541)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

J. C. Lester
London School of Economics

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references