Affirmative citation bias in scientific myth debunking: A three-in-one case study

PLoS ONE 9 (14) (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Several uncorroborated, false, or misinterpreted conceptions have for years been widely distributed in academic publications, thus becoming scientific myths. How can such misconceptions persist and proliferate within the inimical environment of academic criticism? Examining 613 articles we demonstrate that the reception of three myth-exposing publications is skewed by an ‘affirmative citation bias’: The vast majority of articles citing the critical article will affirm the idea criticized. 468 affirmed the myth, 105 were neutral, while 40 took a negative stance. Once misconceptions proliferate wide and long enough, criticizing them not only becomes increasingly difficult, efforts may even contribute to the continued spreading of the myths.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 83,944

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Myth and Ethics in Business.Aviva Geva - 2001 - Business Ethics Quarterly 11 (4):575-597.
Web Citation Indicators for Wider Impact Assessment of Articles.Kayvan Kousha - 2019 - In Wolfgang Glänzel, Henk F. Moed, Ulrich Schmoch & Mike Thelwall (eds.), Springer Handbook of Science and Technology Indicators. Springer Verlag. pp. 801-818.


Added to PP

26 (#476,660)

6 months
1 (#505,949)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Kåre Letrud
Inland Norway University of Applied Sciences

Citations of this work

Incorrigible Science and Doctrinal Pseudoscience.Kåre Letrud - 2022 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 35 (3-4):269-278.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Add more references