Irreconcilable differences: The fundamental incompatibility of science and religion: Lett Irreconcilable differences

Think 2 (4):75-80 (2003)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

James Lett argues passionately that science and religion are not non-overlapping ‘magesteria’, and explains why he believes appeals to religious faith over scientific reason are highly dangerous.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

What is the Difference That Makes a Difference? Gadamer, Habermas, and Rorty.Richard J. Bernstein - 1982 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1982:331 - 359.
Fusionism, Religion and the Tea Party.Uszkai Radu-Bogdan & Socaciu Emanuel-Mihail - 2012 - Journal for the Study of Religions and Ideologies 11 (33):89-106.
Irreconcilable Differences: Pastoral, Elegy, and Epic in Ovid’s Heroides 5.Megan O. Drinkwater - 2015 - Classical World: A Quarterly Journal on Antiquity 108 (3):385-402.
Wittgenstein and Realism.Michael Scott - 2000 - Faith and Philosophy 17 (2):170-190.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-21

Downloads
82 (#200,628)

6 months
1 (#1,510,037)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references