Journal of Business Ethics 13 (2):111 - 123 (1994)

Abstract
The paper questions current assumptions about the benefits of corporate social responsibility and the claims that corporations make on behalf of their corporate social responsibility programmes. In particular, the paper suggests that the use of corporate social responsibility for public relations ends raises moral problems over the motivation of corporations. The paper cautions that the justifications which corporations employ may either be immoral or inaccurate with regard to the empirical evidence gained from a small-scale qualitative study carried out in the UK at a time when the practice of corporate social responsibility was expanding quickly (1989). It is noticeable, in retrospect, that great emphasis is placed upon environmental rather than social responsibility. This implies that organisations are primarily reactive in their development of corporate social responsibility programmes and that they respond to external pressures rather than working out the nature of their corporate responsibilities. It might suggest that corporations only take such actions when they feel compelled to do so by consumerist and environmentalist lobbies. The paper argues that corporations do need to find moral justifications for their moral activities and to ensure that corporate social responsibility practice lives up to the claims made by public relations practitioners. The paper explores the nature of public relations and illustrates how its responsibility for corporate social responsibility extends beyond truthfulness in publicity.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/BF00881580
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 64,229
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Wealth of Nations.Adam Smith - 1976 - Hackett Publishing Company.
The Concept of Corporate Responsibility.Kenneth E. Goodpaster - 1983 - Journal of Business Ethics 2 (1):1 - 22.
Friedman Fallacies.Colin Grant - 1991 - Journal of Business Ethics 10 (12):907 - 914.

View all 9 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

View all 11 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Responsibility, Ethics and Legitimacy of Corporations.Jacob Dahl Rendtorff - 2009 - International Specialized Book Services [Distributor].
A Political Account of Corporate Moral Responsibility.Jeffery Smith - 2011 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 14 (2):223 - 246.
Environmental Integrity and Corporate Responsibility.Richard H. Guerrette - 1986 - Journal of Business Ethics 5 (5):409 - 415.
The Idea of Corporate Social Responsibility.Jacob Dahi Rendtorff - 2007 - The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 1:111-117.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
185 ( #57,945 of 2,455,615 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #449,205 of 2,455,615 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes