A note on categorical properties and contingent identity

Journal of Philosophy 85 (12):718-722 (1988)
Stephen Yablo has attempted recently to revive the notion of contingent identity, identifying this with a relation of L coincidence between objects that are "distinct by nature but the same in the circumstances" (296). Yablo argues convincingly for the need of essentialist metaphysics to recognize some relation of this sort, a relation of "intimate identity-like connections between things" (296) if it is to acknowledge properly the intuitive difference between (i) the nonidentity of a bust B and a hunk of wax H of which it is composed, and (ii) the nonidentity of the hunk H and the Treaty of Versailles. (i) and (ii) are clearly not on the same level. Even though B, like the Treaty of Versailles, fails to be strictly identical to H, it is very closely, and quite specially, related to it. What this relation is is certainly worth a general inquiry
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.2307/2026730
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 25,071
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Coincidence as Overlap.L. A. Paul - 2006 - Noûs 40 (4):623–659.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

41 ( #119,728 of 2,132,817 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

5 ( #175,042 of 2,132,817 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums