Bioethics: An export product? Reflections on hands-on involvement in exploring the “external” validity of international bioethical declarations [Book Review]

Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 6 (3):367-377 (2009)

Authors
Hub Zwart
Erasmus University Rotterdam
Abstract
As the technosciences, including genomics, develop into a global phenomenon, the question inevitably emerges whether and to what extent bioethics can and should become a globalised phenomenon as well. Could we somehow articulate a set of core principles or values that ought to be respected worldwide and that could serve as a universal guide or blueprint for bioethical regulations for embedding biotechnologies in various countries? This article considers one universal declaration, the UNESCO Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights ( 2005a ). General criticisms made in a recent special issue of Developing World Bioethics are that the concepts used in the Declaration are too general and vague to generate real commitment; that the so-called universal values are not universal; and, that UNESCO should not be engaged in producing such declarations which are the domain of professional bioethicists. This article considers these and other criticisms in detail and presents an example of an event in which the Declaration was used: the request by the Republic of Sakha, in Siberia, for a UNESCO delegation to advise on the initiation of a bioethics programme. The Declaration was intended to provide an adequate “framework of principles and procedures to guide states in the formulation of their legislation, policies and other instruments in the field of bioethics” (article 2a). The Declaration was produced, and principles agreed upon, in an interactive and deliberative manner with world-wide expert participation. We argue that the key issue is not whether the general principles can be exported worldwide (in principle they can), but rather how processes of implementation and institutionalisation should take shape in different social and cultural contexts. In particular, broader publics are not routinely involved in bioethical debate and policy-making processes worldwide.
Keywords UNESCO  Public policy  Human dignity  Yakutsk  Bioethics experts  Public engagement
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11673-009-9168-z
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 47,195
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Trouble with Universal Declarations.David Benatar - 2005 - Developing World Bioethics 5 (3):220–224.
Sex Selection and Regulated Hatred.J. Harris - 2005 - Journal of Medical Ethics 31 (5):291-294.

View all 16 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Defending the Indefensible.Udo Schuklenk - 2010 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 7 (1):83-88.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Ambiguity of the Term 'Culture' and its Consequences for the Protection of Human Rights.Nermin Gedik - 2007 - The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 7:33-36.
UNESCO’s Activities in Ethics.Henk A. M. J. ten Have - 2010 - Science and Engineering Ethics 16 (1):7-15.
The Activities of UNESCO in the Area of Ethics.H. ten Have - 2006 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 16 (4):333-351.
Defending the Indefensible.Udo Schuklenk - 2010 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 7 (1):83-88.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-06-15

Total views
54 ( #165,355 of 2,289,525 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #839,123 of 2,289,525 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature