Begging what is at issue in the argument

Argumentation 8 (3):265-282 (1994)

Authors
Don Levi
University of Oregon
Abstract
This paper objects to treating begging the question as circular reasoning. It argues that what is at issue in the argument is not to be confused with the claim or position that the arguer is adopting, and that logicians from Aristotle on give the wrong definition and have difficulty making sense of the fallacy because they try to define it in terms of how an argument is defined by logical theory - as a sequence consisting of premises followed by a conclusion. That the problematic about begging the question depends on treating an argument as a context-less sequence of statements seems to be anticipated by the pragma-dialectical approach. The paper offers a critique of this dialogical approach, as exemplified by Douglas Walton in his recent book on begging the question, on the grounds that it raises more problems than it solves. It concludes with the suggestion that what is really at issue in discussions of begging the question is the need for a theory of fallacy
Keywords Begging the question  what is at issue  sequence of premises and conclusion  theory of fallacy  rhetorical context  participating in the argument  dialogue pragmatics
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/BF00711193
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 44,455
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Fallacies.C. L. Hamblin - 1970 - Vale Press.
Fallacies in Pragma-Dialectical Perspective.R. Grootendorst, Frans Eemeren & Frans H. van Eemeren - 2015 - In Scott Jacobs, Sally Jackson, Frans Eemeren & Frans H. van Eemeren (eds.), Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse. Springer Verlag. pp. 283-301.
The Fallacy of Fallacies.Jaakko Hintikka - 1987 - Argumentation 1 (3):211-238.

View all 16 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Begging the Question.David H. Sanford - 1972 - Analysis 32 (6):197-199.
Petitio Principii: What's Wrong?Andrea Iacona & Diego Marconi - 2005 - Facta Philosophica 7 (1):19-34.
Begging the Question.Walter Sinnott-Armstrong - 1999 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 77 (2):174 – 191.
Begging the Question and Bayesians.Brian Weatherson - 1999 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 30:687-697.
Begging Principles: The Big Issue.Colin Radford - 2001 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 18 (3):287–296.
Locke's "Essay, Book I": The Question-Begging Status of the Anti-Nativist Arguments.Raffaella Rosa - 2004 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 69 (1):37 - 64.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-01-17

Total views
29 ( #302,728 of 2,272,598 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #409,116 of 2,272,598 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature