Philosophical Explorations 14 (3):237-248 (2011)

Neil Levy
Macquarie University
One of the major conflicts in the social sciences since the Second World War has concerned whether, and to what extent, human beings have a nature. One view, traditionally associated with the political left, has rejected the notion that we have a contentful nature, and hoped thereby to underwrite the possibility that we can shape social institutions by references only to norms of justice, rather than our innate dispositions. This view has been in rapid retreat over the past three decades, in the face of an onslaught from several different strands of psychology purporting to show that human nature has a content. In this paper, I argue for a third view: that human beings have a contentful nature, but that nature is uniquely flexible and therefore places relatively few constraints on the shape of our social institutions. Human beings are shaped, by nature, to be cultural animals. We are innately disposed to imitate the behavior of those around us, to a far greater degree than other animals: this disposition toward overimitation allows us to construct local traditions of behavior and thereby to adapt to an enormous variety of environments. These facts, in turn, ensure that human populations live embedded in local forms of life; thus our nature entails that we are deeply cultural animals
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/13869795.2011.594958
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 62,343
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

An Essay Concerning Human Understanding.John Locke - 1689 - Oxford University Press.
Critique of Pure Reason.I. Kant - 1787/1998 - Philosophy 59 (230):555-557.
On the Very Idea of a Conceptual Scheme.Donald Davidson - 1973 - Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 47:5-20.

View all 21 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Can Natural Behavior Be Cultivated? The Farm as Local Human/Animal Culture.Pär Segerdahl - 2007 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 20 (2):167-193.
Duties Regarding Animals.Patrick Kain - 2010 - In Lara Denis (ed.), Kant's Metaphysics of Morals: A Critical Guide. Cambridge University Press. pp. 210--233.
Human Nature: An Oxymoron?David Heyd - 2003 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 28 (2):151 – 169.
Following Human Nature.Nathan Kowalsky - 2006 - Environmental Ethics 28 (2):165-183.
Nature in Aristotle's Ethics and Politics.Richard Kraut - 2007 - Social Philosophy and Policy 24 (2):199-219.
Toward an Ethics of the Domesticated Environment.Roger J. H. King - 2003 - Philosophy and Geography 6 (1):3 – 14.
The Social Bearing of Nature.Theodore R. Schatzki - 2000 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 43 (1):21 – 37.
Nature and Supernature.Frederick Sontag - 1978 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 9 (3):146 - 157.


Added to PP index

Total views
129 ( #81,541 of 2,445,337 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #457,131 of 2,445,337 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes