Disease, Normality, and Current Pharmacological Moral Modification

Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 21 (2):135-137 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Response to commentary. We are grateful to Crockett and Craigie for their interesting remarks on our paper. We accept Crockett’s claim that there is a need for caution in drawing inferences about patient groups from work on healthy volunteers in the laboratory. However, we believe that the evidence we cited established a strong presumption that many of the patients who are routinely taking a medication, including many people properly prescribed the medication for a medical condition, have morally significant aspects of their cognition and behavior modified in a way that is unintended and may sometimes be unwelcome. Crockett notes that in some cases the effects of long-term drug use may differ, sometimes markedly, from the effects of short-term use. However, if acute use of a drug affects a neural system involved in mediating moral cognition or behavior, this nevertheless provides some evidence that chronic use of the drug may affect that same system and thus have morally significant effects. It is also plausible, in some cases, that an acute moral effect would give rise to a chronic moral effect via cognitive mechanisms. ...

Similar books and articles

The Concept of Harm and the Significance of Normality.Guy Kahane & Julian Savulescu - 2012 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 29 (3):318.
The Concept of Harm and the Significance of Normality.Julian Savulescu Guy Kahane - 2012 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 29 (4):318-332.
Normality as a biological concept.Robert Wachbroit - 1994 - Philosophy of Science 61 (4):579-591.
Particularism and default reasons.Pekka Väyrynen - 2004 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 7 (1):53-79.
Health as a theoretical concept.Christopher Boorse - 1977 - Philosophy of Science 44 (4):542-573.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-03-20

Downloads
310 (#62,816)

6 months
96 (#42,008)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?