Did residual normality ever have a chance?

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (6):759-760 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Thomas & Karmiloff- Smith show that the assumption of residual normality does not hold in connectionist simulations, and argue that RN has been inappropriately applied to childhood disorders. We agree. However, we suggest that the RN hypothesis may never have been fully viable, either empirically or computationally



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Residual normality: Friend or foe?Michael Thomas & Annette Karmiloff-Smith - 2002 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (6):772-780.
The beauty of models for developmental disorders.J. Briscoe - 2002 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (6):750-752.


Added to PP

47 (#330,788)

6 months
15 (#157,754)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references