Federalism and the old and new liberalisms

Social Philosophy and Policy 24 (1):306-326 (2007)
Abstract
The transition from a relatively federal to a relatively centralized constitutional structure in the United States has often been identified with the shift from classical to welfare liberalism as a matter of public philosophy. This article argues against that distinction. The liberal argument for federalism is a contingent one, built on approximations, counterbalancing, and political power. A more federalist constitution is not automatically a freer one on classical liberal understandings of freedom. Neither is a more centralized constitution automatically a better match with the ideals of welfare liberalism. The article sketches a constitutional history of federalism from the founding, through an era in which centralization was aligned with skepticism about liberal constitutionalism (for both meanings of liberal), to an era in which centralization was aligned with increases in liberal freedom (for both meanings of liberal).
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/S0265052507070136
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 30,224
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
The Idea of Rights in the Imperial Crisis.Craig Yirush - 2012 - Social Philosophy and Policy 29 (2):82-103.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total downloads
34 ( #155,265 of 2,191,992 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #144,930 of 2,191,992 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature