‘‘‘It could just be an additional test couldn’t it?’:genetic testing for susceptibility to aggression and violence
Much of the current genetic research into aggressive and violent behaviour focuses on young people and might appear to offer the hope of targeted prediction and intervention. In the UK data is collected on children from various agencies and collated to produce ‘at risk of offending’ identities used to justify intervention. Information from behavioural genetic tests could conceivably be included. Regulatory frameworks for collecting, storing and using information from DNA samples differ between the health service and the police particularly in the need for consent and the treatment of children. This paper draws on discussions with professionals involved with ‘problem’ young people to consider their views on the utility of genetic research for tackling violent/aggressive behaviour and the impact an identification of genetic susceptibility might have on their clients.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
The Use of Genetic Test Information in Insurance: The Argument From Indistinguishability Reconsidered.V. Launis - 2000 - Science and Engineering Ethics 6 (3):299-310.
Argumentation and Risk Communication About Genetic Testing: Challenges for Healthcare Consumers and Implications for Computer Systems.Nancy Green - 2012 - Journal of Argumentation in Context 1 (1):113-129.
Are Genetic Self-Tests Dangerous? Assessing the Commercialization of Genetic Testing in Terms of Personal Autonomy.Ludvig Beckman - 2004 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 25 (5-6):387-398.
Polymorphism-Screening: Genetic Testing for Predisposition—Guidance for Technology Assessment. [REVIEW]Claudia Wild - 2008 - Poiesis and Praxis 5 (1):1-14.
Future Directions in Genetic Counseling: Practical and Ethical Considerations.Barabara Biesecker - 1998 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 8 (2):145-160.
Genes, Environment and Responsibility for Violent Behaviour:‘Whatever Genes One has It is Preferable That You Are Prevented From Going Around Stabbing People’.Mairi Levitt - unknown
Â€œGenetic Testing of the General Population: Ethical and Informatic Concernsâ€.Kelly Smith - unknown
Distinguishing Genetic From Nongenetic Medical Tests: Some Implications for Antidiscrimination Legislation.Joseph S. Alper & Jon Beckwith - 1998 - Science and Engineering Ethics 4 (2):141-150.
Ethics and Genetics: Susceptibility Testing in the Workplace. [REVIEW]Chris MacDonald & Bryn Williams-Jones - 2002 - Journal of Business Ethics 35 (3):235 - 241.
How Distinctive is Genetic Information?M. Richards - 2001 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 32 (4):663-687.
The Question Not Asked: The Challenge of Pleiotropic Genetic Tests.Robert Samuel Wachbroit - 1998 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 8 (2):131-144.
Genetic Tests in the Insurance System: Criteria for a Moral Evaluation.Felix Thiele - 2003 - Poiesis and Praxis 1 (3):185-195.
Predictive Genetic Testing for Conditions That Present in Childhood.Lainie Friedman Ross - 2002 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 12 (3):225-244.
Added to index2011-01-29
Total downloads7 ( #528,856 of 2,178,143 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #316,663 of 2,178,143 )
How can I increase my downloads?