Public Reason 1 (1):57-74 (2009)

Authors
Annabelle Lever
SciencesPo, Paris
Abstract
Should voting be compulsory? Many people believe that it should, and that countries, like Britain, which have never had compulsion, ought to adopt it. As is common with such things, the arguments are a mixture of principle and political calculation, reflecting the idea that compulsory voting is morally right and that it is likely to prove politically beneficial. This article casts a sceptical eye on both types of argument. It shows that compulsory voting is generally unjustified although there are good reasons to worry about declining voter turnout in established democracies, and to worry about inequalities of turnout as well.
Keywords compulsory voting, democracy, ethics of voting, freedom, equality, rights, duties, Arendt Lijphart, John Stuart Mill
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2009
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 70,091
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Opposition.[author unknown] - 1940 - Archives de Philosophie 16:85.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2010-07-25

Total views
438 ( #21,855 of 2,506,173 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #277,380 of 2,506,173 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes