Public Reason 1 (1):57-74 (2009)
Authors |
|
Abstract |
Should voting be compulsory? Many people believe that it should, and that countries,
like Britain, which have never had compulsion, ought to adopt it. As is common with such things, the arguments are a mixture of principle and political calculation, reflecting the idea that compulsory voting is morally right and that it is likely to prove politically beneficial. This article casts a sceptical eye on both types of argument. It shows that compulsory voting is generally unjustified although there are good reasons to worry about declining voter turnout in established democracies, and to worry about inequalities of turnout as well.
|
Keywords | compulsory voting, democracy, ethics of voting, freedom, equality, rights, duties, Arendt Lijphart, John Stuart Mill |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
Reprint years | 2009 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
Mill and the Secret Ballot: Beyond Coercion and Corruption.Annabelle Lever - 2007 - Utilitas 19 (3):354-378.
'A Liberal Defence of Compulsory Voting': Some Reasons for Scepticism.Annabelle Lever - 2008 - POLITICS 28 (1):61-64.
Citations of this work BETA
Making Attentive Citizens: The Ethics of Democratic Engagement, Political Equality, and Social Justice.Kevin Elliott - 2018 - Res Publica 24 (1):73-91.
Similar books and articles
The Aggressiveness of Playful Arguments.Dale Hample, Bing Han & David Payne - 2010 - Argumentation 24 (4):405-421.
Compulsory Voting and Inclusion: A Response to Saunders.Clara Fischer - 2011 - POLITICS 31 (1):2011.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2010-07-25
Total views
438 ( #21,855 of 2,506,173 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #277,380 of 2,506,173 )
2010-07-25
Total views
438 ( #21,855 of 2,506,173 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #277,380 of 2,506,173 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads